Ok forum is set-up
The reveiwers should be able to see it.
Go here for further instructions.🙂
Wow how exciting is this.🙂
New AVS reviewers on Winamp.com
78 posts
Looked around, didn't see the forum. Any hints as to where it might be, or is it in a blindingly obvious place and should I be smacked?
? you posted in it?😕 🤪
It is a new forum and there are only 2 threads in it and one is a mods wanting to post first in the forum thread.🙂
It is a new forum and there are only 2 threads in it and one is a mods wanting to post first in the forum thread.🙂
Yeah, I followed your link. Found it now though. <smacks self> It was right under private messages.
<subtle hint>Perhaps now my packs will get reviewed...</subtle hint>
Sorry, couldn't resist... my fingers - they just started typing.... goddamnit they are doing it again...
Sorry, couldn't resist... my fingers - they just started typing.... goddamnit they are doing it again...
Thank you VERY much, I won't dissapoint you people 🙂.
Just to make everyting clear, the log-in and password needed are the same as the one you use to submit your AVS presets. We can't do nothing with your forum login. (well, we could, but we won't 😉 )
I hope this post isn't dead and buried yet.
Well anyway.
My only concern about this review thing is that will it be a objective review? I mean if your an avs artist and you review others work you might give them a bad review or a good review depending on the artist no matter about the work...
Example I consider Montana as a friend since we chat almost daily at irc and are both active in the avs community at deviantart.com
So im asking will he be giving me 4,5 start just BECAUSE? Or would he downrate my work if he personally doesn't like it or knowing basicly my whole avs history would he be disapointed when compared to the older works?
I guess im a bit sceptic about this whole thing, but im just asking...
No offense Montana this has nothing to do with you... actually it is about you, but that's not the point meaning that this post could be directed for example nic01 or degnic ( being a fellow ff member i would sure "blow the horn" twice as loud 😉 ), but they didn't make it as reviewer.
Waiting for your reply...
Well anyway.
My only concern about this review thing is that will it be a objective review? I mean if your an avs artist and you review others work you might give them a bad review or a good review depending on the artist no matter about the work...
Example I consider Montana as a friend since we chat almost daily at irc and are both active in the avs community at deviantart.com
So im asking will he be giving me 4,5 start just BECAUSE? Or would he downrate my work if he personally doesn't like it or knowing basicly my whole avs history would he be disapointed when compared to the older works?
I guess im a bit sceptic about this whole thing, but im just asking...
No offense Montana this has nothing to do with you... actually it is about you, but that's not the point meaning that this post could be directed for example nic01 or degnic ( being a fellow ff member i would sure "blow the horn" twice as loud 😉 ), but they didn't make it as reviewer.
Waiting for your reply...
jukka, i'm hard with reviewing,
i will not review like in deviantart where i comment on stuff,
so...
i will not review like in deviantart where i comment on stuff,
so...
How do you tell with anybody? I assume we were picked because Rovastar read some reviews we have done, and didn't just go through the thread picking names at random. (uhh, you did read some of or reviews, right Rovastar)
I read a few reviews not that many really to be honest with you - you lot had the most interest and that sway the decision also.
Anyway as I said it is a learning curve I am worried about being too hard we have a chance now with the new WA3 site to set new standards.
Initially there will be a lot of discussion about what is 3 stars, etc, etc. And we will try and get an average. After a few weeks/months we will know a lot better what standards we have and it is be harder to deviate from them levels.
If someone obviously has realised a 2 star pack and a review person who is a friend gives it 4.5 stars then they jeopardize the credibility/existence as a reviewer so I cannot imagine too many doing that.
Obviously people will not be allowed to review their own packs, etc.
Anyway as I said it is a learning curve I am worried about being too hard we have a chance now with the new WA3 site to set new standards.
Initially there will be a lot of discussion about what is 3 stars, etc, etc. And we will try and get an average. After a few weeks/months we will know a lot better what standards we have and it is be harder to deviate from them levels.
If someone obviously has realised a 2 star pack and a review person who is a friend gives it 4.5 stars then they jeopardize the credibility/existence as a reviewer so I cannot imagine too many doing that.
Obviously people will not be allowed to review their own packs, etc.
Whomever made that string a sticky post was a vertiable genius.
i would be willing to bet that *almost* nobody would have gotten interested in it otherwise.
(umm, where can i bitch (besides here) about the grammer on the forum log-in screen?)
Thank, you're in, Karnov!
(it would be "thanks")
(note the "s")
(the one in between to the "k" and the ",")
(Sorry everyone, but i was getting rocked in Battlefield 1942 so i am being a smartass)
(damn nazis)
i would be willing to bet that *almost* nobody would have gotten interested in it otherwise.
(umm, where can i bitch (besides here) about the grammer on the forum log-in screen?)
Thank, you're in, Karnov!
(it would be "thanks")
(note the "s")
(the one in between to the "k" and the ",")
(Sorry everyone, but i was getting rocked in Battlefield 1942 so i am being a smartass)
(damn nazis)
(off-topic)
Heh, I'm not the only one who's bothered by the 'Thank, you're in' message. Someone fix it please 😎...?
Heh, I'm not the only one who's bothered by the 'Thank, you're in' message. Someone fix it please 😎...?
...and the correct spelling is GRAMMAR, i found that a bit funny.
subtle_hint{
//just thought i'd maybe try and drop another subtle hint in here
plz review my packs they have been there for ages now since before winamp3 was released i've had so much time that i updated them with winamp3 compatible installers and that was 21 days ago. give them one star and say that they are a pile of cack... i don't care i just want ppl to be able to download them.
};
subtle_hint{
//just thought i'd maybe try and drop another subtle hint in here
plz review my packs they have been there for ages now since before winamp3 was released i've had so much time that i updated them with winamp3 compatible installers and that was 21 days ago. give them one star and say that they are a pile of cack... i don't care i just want ppl to be able to download them.
};
heyyyyyyyyyy.... grammer grammar sounds the same
but thats right, unconed made fun of me for my phonetic spellings, so i better not start that again :-P
jheriko; me thinks your subtle hints are not very subtle anymore 😁
(u sure grammer/grammar isnt like grey/gray?)
(i hope it is, then ill kinda save face)
but thats right, unconed made fun of me for my phonetic spellings, so i better not start that again :-P
jheriko; me thinks your subtle hints are not very subtle anymore 😁
(u sure grammer/grammar isnt like grey/gray?)
(i hope it is, then ill kinda save face)
i think the best words would have been BLATANT HINT. or something like {{JUMPS UP AND DOWN SCREAMING FOR SOME ATTENTION}}
R E V I E W
M Y
P A C K S
or something like that...
*cough*
but i'd get complained at for being immature and for trying to bias the opinions of reviewers or for being an attention seeker.🤪
besides continually plugging my work is a part of who i am.
R E V I E W
M Y
P A C K S
or something like that...
*cough*
but i'd get complained at for being immature and for trying to bias the opinions of reviewers or for being an attention seeker.🤪
besides continually plugging my work is a part of who i am.
Don't shamelessly plug your packs like that, it makes you look desperate. 👎
Instead, be nasty and plug them unconsciously everywhere you. Put subliminal messages into your Avatar, write your posts so that they read "DOWNLOAD MY PACKS" when written backwards and enslave those that do download them into a trance of mindless wondering.😎 😁
Instead, be nasty and plug them unconsciously everywhere you. Put subliminal messages into your Avatar, write your posts so that they read "DOWNLOAD MY PACKS" when written backwards and enslave those that do download them into a trance of mindless wondering.😎 😁
<assume voice /noob>
Unconed can you help me?
im having trouble with the mind control superscopes.
ive searched everywhere (except google) and i cant seem to be able to do it
plz write me two or three that i can "tweak"
</assume>
😁
(the sad thing is, about a month ago i was an uber-noob)
(now i only consider myself a semi-noob)
(but that doesnt stop me from making fun of the hoi polli)
(hoi polli is a phrase i learned in my american lit class)
(the funny thing is that its a greek word (maybe latin))
(shoot, i think i ran outta paranetsis for this week 🙁)
Unconed can you help me?
im having trouble with the mind control superscopes.
ive searched everywhere (except google) and i cant seem to be able to do it
plz write me two or three that i can "tweak"
</assume>
😁
(the sad thing is, about a month ago i was an uber-noob)
(now i only consider myself a semi-noob)
(but that doesnt stop me from making fun of the hoi polli)
(hoi polli is a phrase i learned in my american lit class)
(the funny thing is that its a greek word (maybe latin))
(shoot, i think i ran outta paranetsis for this week 🙁)
its hoi poloi and it is latin
my avs packs deserve huge amounts of viewing and respect thats why i plug them so shamelessly, they are really good and no one will believe me. (not quite yet up to unconed standard but give me a copule more packs and i'll be there). besides those three packs have been up there for almost two months now. just waiting to be reviewed, it annoys me thats all.
my avs packs deserve huge amounts of viewing and respect thats why i plug them so shamelessly, they are really good and no one will believe me. (not quite yet up to unconed standard but give me a copule more packs and i'll be there). besides those three packs have been up there for almost two months now. just waiting to be reviewed, it annoys me thats all.
oh i know how u feel...kinda
i would try resubmitting cuase it didnt take that long for my pak to get reviewed 😉
(and damnit, why am i always wrong? pssh! grammer, hoi polli, greek)🙄
oh yeah, how do u get that thing that tells what song ur listening to? that is really damned cool!
i think you should get other people to plug for u too
ok, i gtg to bed, i am tired, and my coding quota has been met
i would try resubmitting cuase it didnt take that long for my pak to get reviewed 😉
(and damnit, why am i always wrong? pssh! grammer, hoi polli, greek)🙄
oh yeah, how do u get that thing that tells what song ur listening to? that is really damned cool!
i think you should get other people to plug for u too
ok, i gtg to bed, i am tired, and my coding quota has been met
there are two places that i know of to get that thing:
www.winampdb.com - this one is probably the best one
www.audio-tracker.com - this is the one i use cos i like to be different
www.winampdb.com - this one is probably the best one
www.audio-tracker.com - this is the one i use cos i like to be different
We are still geting the access to the review section on the website sorted out and then we will probably spend few more days getting some standard ratings sorted out. So give it a week.
In fact I decided to make your 5 pack a test case for backstage.
So I don't want to here another word about it. ok. 🙂😉😛
"Thank, you're in," ahs been there for years I think as some joke (or turned into) by the Orginal Niullsoft boys. They find it funny so know it willnot change.🙂🙂
In fact I decided to make your 5 pack a test case for backstage.
So I don't want to here another word about it. ok. 🙂😉😛
"Thank, you're in," ahs been there for years I think as some joke (or turned into) by the Orginal Niullsoft boys. They find it funny so know it willnot change.🙂🙂
Originally posted by Rovastarnow that is a good joke... (or a good excuse for those spelling mistakes:P)
"Thank, you're in," ahs been there for years I think as some joke (or turned into) by the Orginal Niullsoft boys. They find it funny so know it willnot change.🙂🙂
and thank you, i won't mention it any more. my pack 5 is really varied in quality (i.e. some of it is cack, some of it is really cool) so i'd be interested to see what you give it.
(its not been uploaded to winamp.com yet just my 12&3 since it wont let me put anymore up yet. i guess i make them too quickly.)
nuff said. 😁
"The site is B0rken" is better 🙂.
I guess it's like:
"We like you. We like your skin/component. We also like beer (hint hint). We live at 375 Alabama Street Suite 350 San Francisco, CA 94110. "
Btw, isn't it borked instead of borken?
"We like you. We like your skin/component. We also like beer (hint hint). We live at 375 Alabama Street Suite 350 San Francisco, CA 94110. "
Btw, isn't it borked instead of borken?
both of you lost me there...
it was the borken/borked bit that got me
heyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
dudes!!
if you say that the new AVS reviewers arent allowed to use leet speak, its kinda frustrating when the current ones do 😠
quote{
Decent presets... somewhat basic tho There are a few really nice ones here; particularly the ones that utilize el-vis superscopes. The author's own 'Primary' is very nice; overall a solid pack for a first release. Some additional tweaking and experimentation would be nice tho.
}
"tho"?!!??!?!?
ok, this post sounds a lot more pissed off than i meant it to be
total props to the AVS reviewers (then and now) for the damn good job they do
but you must decied wheather or not to use leet speak (if i were j00 (🙂) i would opt not too)
really, im not as pissed off as i sound
dudes!!
if you say that the new AVS reviewers arent allowed to use leet speak, its kinda frustrating when the current ones do 😠
quote{
Decent presets... somewhat basic tho There are a few really nice ones here; particularly the ones that utilize el-vis superscopes. The author's own 'Primary' is very nice; overall a solid pack for a first release. Some additional tweaking and experimentation would be nice tho.
}
"tho"?!!??!?!?
ok, this post sounds a lot more pissed off than i meant it to be
total props to the AVS reviewers (then and now) for the damn good job they do
but you must decied wheather or not to use leet speak (if i were j00 (🙂) i would opt not too)
really, im not as pissed off as i sound
what! where is the 1337 speak there.
|]0/\/'7 `/0|_| |</\/0\/\/ \/\/|-|47 |_337 5|>34|< !5 ????
|]0/\/'7 `/0|_| |</\/0\/\/ \/\/|-|47 |_337 5|>34|< !5 ????