Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!

13 posts

JFASIFebruary 24, 2006 at 3:07 PM#

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!

I had the most amazing framrate in the history of history!!! I could run Jet Wash at 35.6 fps at 400X300 no pix doubling!!! I had an idle framerate of 250!!!!! I LOST IT ALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I INSTALLED WA 5.2 AND IT ALL DISAPPEARED LIKE A SUMMER DAYDREAM!!!!!!!!!! AAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! WAAAAAAAILLLL!!!! AAAAARRRRRRRRRGGGGHHHHHHHH!!! MY 2.8 GHZ 1GB L2 CACHE 1GB RAM GEFORCE FX5200 MONSTER HAS BEEN KILLED BY A SOOOOOOOOOOOOFFFFTWAAAAARRRRRRRE PROOOOOOOOOOBLEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

TuggummiFebruary 24, 2006 at 3:15 PM#

Okay, i know im drunk, but what the hell are you taking? 🧟

JFASIFebruary 24, 2006 at 3:29 PM#

I just took a big hit in AVS preformance with the installation of WA 5.2.

TuggummiFebruary 24, 2006 at 4:15 PM#

Well i haven't updated my winamp since... i don't even know what my winamp version is at the moment 🧟

JFASIFebruary 24, 2006 at 5:25 PM#

5.2, it just came out.

51StrongFebruary 26, 2006 at 9:27 PM#

I installed wa 5.2 yesterday didnt notice any diff in performance, im runing the visbot mod of avs though duno if that makes any diff at all.

JaVS_v2.5February 27, 2006 at 7:54 AM#

You must be kidding, jerk :P

JFASIFebruary 27, 2006 at 10:43 PM#

I don't know, my speed seemed extremely inflated to begin with, so it probably returned to a normal level.

[edit] I fiddled with the good old settings and found my problem. Six of them. [/edit]

hornet777February 28, 2006 at 9:16 AM#

Originally posted by JFASI
my speed seemed extremely inflated to begin with...

have you seen a doctor about this?

ClashmanMarch 29, 2006 at 5:48 PM#

I tried 5.2 the other day, and it wouldn't even start up.

Went back to 5.11, runs like a dream (except when I try to tweak a couple APEs - Tentacles 3D and Metaballs 3D, IIRC).

toqerApril 3, 2006 at 9:06 AM#

j000 4r3 n0t l337 I y00z w1n4mp 1.0

luddite dorks.

PAK-9April 3, 2006 at 9:31 AM#

Yes he must be a luddite for complaining about a highly technical piece of sofware performing less efficiently. Why do people use that term? It just smacks of ignorance and buzzword insulting to me. Don't you think it is just a little bit ironic using something as anachronistic as Ludditism from the industrial revolution in an argument about software?

You could claim that "Luddite" has become an accepted term for one who opposes the advancement of technology (dubiously I would argue).. but software version changes?! Give me a fucking break.

"I made this new version of my software and its full of bugs and crashes all the time.. But you have to upgrade otherwise you are a Luddite, hur hur"

ClashmanApril 3, 2006 at 11:54 AM#

Originally posted by toqer
j000 4r3 n0t l337 I y00z w1n4mp 1.0

luddite dorks.

Nonononono, just "dissatisfied with the bugs in WA5.2x".

Luddites don't use huigh-tech stuff, period. In fact, the more extreme Luddites go around smashing any tech they can get their hands on.

(Encyclopedic knowledge for the win!)