First ever release of AVS's i've done...
Dont criticize me too much 🙂
And If you wanna use it, you're free... just tell me 🙂
BlurAVS
17 posts
Some of these are ok, but a couple are seizure induciiiiiinnnnnnnggggggggggggggggggdsoinhtesnhdflgndgh
i for my part don't like those flickering presets, but the flowers are nice.
Originally posted by ^..^...if the scopecode were your own, but it isn't, is it?
but the flowers are nice.
unfortunately not 😉
honestly, the code isn't that bad.. 🙂
honestly, the code isn't that bad.. 🙂
PSH, around here, there goes a simple rule: "give credit where credit is due" - If you use something from someone else, name him and the preset it came from in your comment.
(also, check if they don't forbid to use their stuff at all as some might do)
further, good stuff. Keep it up!
(also, check if they don't forbid to use their stuff at all as some might do)
further, good stuff. Keep it up!
The superscope is a modified preset... so credit to nullsoft...
But who made the preset which the scope was in? That is who you should ggive credit to.
let me guess: your scope bases on the superscope example called "exploding daisy", right? I was wondering all the time where i have seen that code before and accidently i just came to it.
So, to whom should this credit go? I think no one really knows who made those "built-in" examples that come along with the superscope, movement, dynamic-movement etc.😕
So, to whom should this credit go? I think no one really knows who made those "built-in" examples that come along with the superscope, movement, dynamic-movement etc.😕
owww. my bad then. Are those builtins still using 3.14159265358979 then? (shorter, I know.. I only know the 14 digit version (really) ) How ancient... that's what we started with indeed, then came pi=acos(-1) and now we have $pi
it seems as if those "builtins" have been revised since the "old days", cause they're using $PI now.
hmmm nice work if may say so myself 😉 but i know for one... these are all edits... although i dont mind some... i dont like the inversions... 😛
Every single one has been made from scratch... i used some preset stuff... but overall i did it, and havent edited...
Yeah, so the bits that you did use, whose were they? That is what we are saying you dimwit.
your determined to find out aren't you =P
hm i'm wondering. what do you mean mysterious_w? Earlier this thread we found out that the supercopes are taken from the built in examples (when you click the "Load example..." button in the ssc config box). And he didn't use anything else creditable, did he?
ohh well...