Winamp 2.91 vs Winamp3

Timzone8September 30, 2003 at 9:07 AM#

Sure I admit, [color="lime-green"]"AVS is great!"[/color]
But why the lack of performance when released with Winamp3. 🙁
The quality and speed of AVS decreased dramaticaly when it was released with Winamp3, or is this not so? 🙄
High speed computers may not be able to pick it up, but a 500mhz or less should notice this change...does the new AVS display for Winamp3 benifit anyone or was it a mistake?

I'm not contradicting myself when I said "AVS is great!"...it is...but which is better? 😁

YathoshoSeptember 30, 2003 at 9:51 AM#

fyi: winamp 3 is discontinued. winamp 2.91 is newer than winamp 3. the upcoming winamp 5 will combine winamp 2 and 3.

JaakSeptember 30, 2003 at 10:19 AM#

winamp 3 takes too much resurces, thats why the avs is slow on it... winamp 2.x pwns winamp 3 in anytime and anywhere (exept skins ofcourse)

Timzone8September 30, 2003 at 10:30 AM#

RE:killahbite
What happened to a Winamp4? :P

RE:Jack the king
yer I sorta new that...hense the poll and questions(moreso hidden statements)

YathoshoSeptember 30, 2003 at 11:02 AM#

Originally posted by Timzone8
RE:killahbite
What happened to a Winamp4? :P

2+3=5

thought it's been all over the news

DeamonSeptember 30, 2003 at 1:15 PM#

it has been. and said about a 1000 times over here.

anubis2003September 30, 2003 at 1:32 PM#

at least 100, anyways.

YathoshoSeptember 30, 2003 at 2:04 PM#

yes, anyways... it's always good to post something.

DeamonSeptember 30, 2003 at 6:28 PM#

yes it is, postpumpers 😉

RovastarSeptember 30, 2003 at 7:46 PM#

Really is there any need of this. WA2 vs WA3. No not really.

*Clunk*