Skip to content
Forum Archive

can you do this with avs ???

34 posts

Tuggummi#
AVS:
Better in speed? : Hell no!
Better in resolution/image quality? Uhmm... No!
Better in beat-detection? Can't say since i can't even run your plugin.
Better in variety?: With thousands of artists, it better be!
Better in originality?: Check above.
More user friendly?: Well d'uh... there isn't that much avs presets for nothing...



It's all about which you prefer, but the AVS forums is definetly the worst place in the world to come show-off your plugin. I ask you again: W-h-y d-o y-o-u h-a-v-e, t-o p-r-o-v-e t-h-e s-u-p-e-r-i-o-r-t-y o-f y-o-u-r p-l-u-g-i-n t-o u-s? Since it's obviously so much better?
Rovastar#
th3matr1x,

I really do not get your point here. WHat are you trying to prove? I am flexable enough if you had to a new plugin to post it here as I know some members want to see the whole spectrum of visualization stuff. But I don't want to see you over pimping your stuff or overly slagging off AVS.

Obviously a custom written 3d hardware driven OPenGL/Direct X plugin/program will run quicker, etc then the CPU based AVS but showing of this obvious fact is getting you nowhere.

But sadly for you one thing that AVS has got that you haven't is a sense of community. THe community is what makes AVS popular and grow all the time. To dis AVS is to also dis the community.