7th June 2005 22:28 UTC
WFC3
This thread would be here anyway..
Noone post here for at least another month.
Archive: WFC3
Warrior of the Light
7th June 2005 22:28 UTC
WFC3
This thread would be here anyway..
Noone post here for at least another month.
jheriko
7th June 2005 22:41 UTC
F*#k that, I'm starting now... otherwise I wont be able to keep up !!!
Tuggummi
7th June 2005 23:41 UTC
* Runs off to make "Cooking in your pot too"
Warrior of the Light
7th June 2005 23:44 UTC
okay then. If you want to post, then post ideas, tips, hints etc.
jheriko
8th June 2005 00:05 UTC
Tip: Never stick your hand in a toaster.
:P
Tuggummi
8th June 2005 00:09 UTC
Originally posted by jherikoEspecially if you have a fork in your hand!
Tip: Never stick your hand in a toaster.
:P
PAK-9
8th June 2005 01:29 UTC
Tip: Pretend your not going to be in a WFC pack, then make a last minute entry and take it by storm! bwahaha!
ASD5A
8th June 2005 08:12 UTC
Tip: Set a longer deadline and put only stuff in that came after the deadline
Tuggummi
8th June 2005 09:08 UTC
hint: Somebody do a Star Wars related preset, because Episode III is the shiznazz :D
Warrior of the Light
8th June 2005 10:33 UTC
I built a podracer once, even before El-Vis' one, it looked better, but I didn't save too frequently back then.. even better: I didn't even save at all.. then WA crashed. I might try to rebuild it one day.
jheriko
8th June 2005 12:16 UTC
make a really good star wars related model... then make a preset out of it...
Mr_Nudge
10th June 2005 00:11 UTC
WFC3 already? man....this will be tough. i've made 2 presets in the last 3 months. i need a serious burst of creativity/inspiration if i'm to pull anything off this time
^..^
10th June 2005 11:37 UTC
Burst of inspiration? Try this! ;)
But we really should wait a month or two, before starting WFC3! It seems as if i'm also running in a lack of creativity somehow (actually it's a lack of motivation to some extend :hang: )
Doggy Dog
10th June 2005 13:56 UTC
Originally posted by jheriko
Tip: Never stick your hand in a toaster.
:P
jheriko
15th June 2005 08:03 UTC
tips:
lets wait a while before 'officially starting' with a bigger deadline
submit presets here for comments suggestions before finally sending to wotl (or whoever is organising... but wotl has been doing an ok job so far as far as i'm concerned).
submitting presets here will also allow selective and perhaps multiple remixing which will hopefully get some better quality of remixes out with pack.
we should let people only make presets or only remix if they want.
feel free to diss these suggestions at leisure below. i understand particularly why posting presets here might not be considered a good idea.
PAK-9
15th June 2005 14:17 UTC
Okay if we're getting serious about these suggestions:
1.) I think we should have a bit of quality control. A lot of people commented on wfc1&2 that there was a big variation in quality throughout the pack, I know we want to accurately represent the community, but I'm not sure including presets from people like Kookee really does that.
2.) Remixes, I thought there were too many in wfc2, and generally the quality of a remix is worse than that of an original preset (yes I know there are definately exceptions to this); Again its a bit of a quality control issue, why not do the remixes but let the community chose the best 5 or 10 and put them in.
I realise its nice to keep the presets a secret before releasing the pack, and these ideas conflict with that a bit, so any other suggestions?
Tuggummi
15th June 2005 14:54 UTC
Im not too hot about posting here for comments and improvement, because i know PAK would bite my head off right away :hang:
I like the idea for selecting what you want to remix, but i still like to be surprised when the final pack comes out... hmm this is one tough cookie.
Maybe we should just vote and see how the chips fall.
^..^
15th June 2005 16:23 UTC
I agree to tug! Though i'm sure that i never submit really crappy stuff i'm also not that eager for getting taken to pieces.
But i've got an idea how we could ensure 'quality control' while most people will still be surprised by the finished product: what if we'd set up a jury of let's say 2-3 "well-known-AVS'ers" who would collect all the presets in the first place? Now they could discuss the submitted presets among each other and separately confer with each participant (if necessary). At first i'd suggest WotL to be one of the jurors. The other one(s) could be voted or something.
Proposition is put to discussion.... now!
PAK-9
15th June 2005 17:00 UTC
Seems like a good idea to me. Only problem might be that what the jurors consider a good preset might not be shared by everyone.
Tuggummi
15th June 2005 20:13 UTC
Neither Me or PAK-9 shouldn't be a jury member then...
^..^
15th June 2005 20:36 UTC
what do you mean now tug? :weird:
Seems that i didn't get your double-negation :p
About the proposal: let's all just name a few people that will be asked if they run for that job. After that we could make a poll.
Warrior of the Light
15th June 2005 22:34 UTC
I'm kinda against posting presets as an attachment.. people that post their presets early automatically get more attention drawn to them..
My variaton on this otherwise fine idea:
^..^
15th June 2005 23:34 UTC
1) i vote for WotL as 'Mr.X'! :)
2) But i somehow dislike the idea that all stuff is public before the pack is released. Cause its just so much fun to get surprised by the final pack!
Though, considered by itself, the process WotL suggested seems ok and fair to me.
Warrior of the Light
15th June 2005 23:47 UTC
you have an alternative then how to shrink the ammount of remixes?
^..^
15th June 2005 23:56 UTC
Quote:
PAK-9
16th June 2005 01:01 UTC
Thats still too many, I prefer the jury idea, that way its still a surprise for most people.
eheiney
16th June 2005 02:34 UTC
I like ^..^'s jury idea as well, that way the pack would retain high quality presets. But the jury would have to be very well selected, as to avoid discrimination.
Also, to maybe expand on ^..^'s idea a bit: set up the jury of three artists. If two vote for a preset to be put in the pack, it will be submitted.
I agree that there were too many remixes as well. They're fun, but I always like the originals better. I think the same jury should later vote for remixes.
Another thought I just had: We might create the jury of willing artists who won't be contributing to this pack, to further ensure that there is no discrimination. There's a lot of other artists in the community who don't visit these forums as often, or those who wouldn't submit to this pack for various reasons. I'm sure there's at least three other avsers whose judgment we can trust. We could get one "techy" guy, one "arty" guy and maybe even a retired artist who still has some fascination with avs. ;)
Anyway, that's just my two cents...
jheriko
16th June 2005 08:19 UTC
posting here was just a thought, its a shame we dont have a WFC private forum, it would just make doing stuff like this in secret a lot easier.
i sort of expected no one to like the idea... hence my comment at the end of the post.
the jury idea sounds like a good alternative.
on the subject of remixes. i think less is more about 50% the original number of presets is ideal imo, 150% as a max limit. too many more remixes than presets is excessive. it might be nice if we remixed some of the previous wfc presets... or maybe even random presets by wfc artists for some variation. the less of the same preset you see in a pack the better :)
mysterious_w
16th June 2005 08:32 UTC
I reckon we should have free remixing, and we select the best from each person, as otheriwse if we have 10 remixes it might be 3 tugg, 3 pak-9, 3 jheriko and 1 for the rest of us to squabble over.
^..^
16th June 2005 18:10 UTC
1) i like denkensiefursich's suggestion to ask artists who do not participate at all to do the jury-job! That way really no one knows the result before it's released.
2) I appreciate your idea jheriko! But is there any chance to set up a private forum or something else actually? Where we could discuss all those fundamental things bout the pack?
3) The suggestion mysterious_w made is also ok. But we should also ensure that not unconditionaly one preset and remix from every participant is added to the pack, just because he wants to contribute. Cause then we'd skip the quality control we wanted to have. But at least we can keep an eye on versatility of artists.
Tuggummi
16th June 2005 19:55 UTC
Maybe if there were more than 3 jury members then the jury could participate also. For example if we had 4 jury members and if jury member A makes a preset and atleast 2 of the 3 left over jury members agree of it's quality it's accepted.
Well something like that, i'll leave the refining of the idea to you because im tired and i need to go to bed :p
jheriko
16th June 2005 21:34 UTC
to be honest i wouldnt mind completely dodging the remix phase again, that should help keep the number of remixes down. :)
as regards to the private forum, why not just discuss it more on #avs. several of us go there already, and we already give each other feedback and help.
Tuggummi
17th June 2005 13:14 UTC
Okay I know when im not wanted.
Warrior of the Light
20th June 2005 00:11 UTC
Forum's up.. I may still change some things, but for now it's up. I'm off to bed as it's 1 AM here.
Post away, don't forget to register
Edit:
o yeah, I forgot: a link would be nice too :o
Just go there via www.Warrior-of-the-Light.net.tc
^..^
23rd June 2005 14:47 UTC
meanwhile WotL's forum has left infancy and become a tidy place to chat. So why not join it so that we can discuss all further details about WFC3 there?!
Now that WotL spent the last two nights to get that forum online we should use that friendly offer imho! Not only because we'll have a lot more privacy there. ;)
Warrior of the Light
23rd June 2005 14:52 UTC
you're all welcome..
just know that I do not intend to vote over important decisions just yet as a lot of people are on holiday..
But any ideas/opinions are always welcome there.
^..^
23rd June 2005 14:58 UTC
hmm, no votes. so the pack won't be released before early fall anyhow?! That'll be alright for me.
But still, there are a couple of things to be clarified. So come one folks! :)
Tuggummi
23rd June 2005 16:53 UTC
I can't be bothered to join wotl's forum (im too lazy), just tell me when to start making presets (i need 1 week).
^..^
23rd June 2005 17:26 UTC
so you don't want to have any influence on the way we'll do the quality selection? And also you don't care about who will judge your presets?
Well, then you won't mind pak to be one of the jurors, right?
:p
Tuggummi
23rd June 2005 18:26 UTC
I have no problem with that, PAK's a bitch at me yes, but he's still a lot more fair than many other people.
^..^
23rd June 2005 21:31 UTC
ok, but still we have to vote how we want to proceed this time. and if we chose the jury-idea we also have to elect their members.
So, i vote for the jury idea with 3-4 jurors.
And as such i suggest the established artists (in alphabetical order):
Jheriko
PAK-9
Tuggummi
WotL
again, these are just my suggestions. So feel free to ditch it if you don't agree!
Warrior of the Light
23rd June 2005 22:21 UTC
Originally posted by TuggummiAs far as I'm concerned we start late August,
I can't be bothered to join wotl's forum (im too lazy), just tell me when to start making presets (i need 1 week).
PAK-9
23rd June 2005 23:18 UTC
I'd say:
Presets: Max 2 per person
Remixes: People can make as many as they want (and whomever they want) but the jury will just pick the best 'n' (where n is 30-50% the total number of original presets)
^..^
23rd June 2005 23:28 UTC
Sounds good to me, but how do we keep crap presets (not remixes) from the pack then?
anyway i also suggest to continue in WotL's forum
Warrior of the Light
24th June 2005 01:24 UTC
will you stop spamming my forum? he knows where to find it.
^..^
24th June 2005 10:27 UTC
sorry :hang:
didn't think about that... hope you won't be that angry with me. I really meant no harm!
Tuggummi
24th June 2005 14:05 UTC
I only want to see more originals than remixes this time around, how the remixing choices etc. happen I don't really have a opinion about... Id like to choose, but i want to be surprised by the final also, though if im going to be one of the jurors that's unlikely to happen... though cookie it's hard to find a solution for this that will please everyone so someone just needs to draw the lines straight, liked it or not.
mysterious_w
24th June 2005 23:54 UTC
would you be opposed to an absolutely huge pack of 90 presets or somthing (50 originals and 40 remixes) if they were all of at least fair quality, or does a line have to be drawn somewhere?
PAK-9
25th June 2005 01:20 UTC
I would be opposed, because 90 presets would be comprimising quality
Mr_Nudge
25th June 2005 06:28 UTC
how about...2 presets from each authour. 1 (being their most suitable) is send to someone for remixing.
Tuggummi
25th June 2005 10:28 UTC
And who decides what suitable for whom? :igor:
^..^
25th June 2005 11:55 UTC
that's the problem actually. One the one hand people would like to decide which presets they recieve for remixing, but on the other hand they want to be surpirsed by the final pack.
anyway, i for my part liked the way we proceeded with remixes last time: i just got a little bunch of presets and decided which of them i wanted to remix.
But nevertheless, if someone doesn't want to get eg. too tech-heavy presets etc. for remixing he can tell it (to Mr.X/ or the Jury/ or only post it) so that he'll only get presets of a certain kind.
eheiney
26th June 2005 00:40 UTC
I agree with ^..^ on that one; the way we proceeded the last tmie suited me just fine.
But I also agree that some sort of presets are harder for some to remix. We all know each other's styles pretty well, and it's not very hard to distinguish what style of presets someone would prefer to remix.
I don't know if WotL took that into consideration the last time, but it seemed so to me.
Warrior of the Light
27th June 2005 11:34 UTC
Originally posted by denkensiefursicIn WFC1 I checked who would be capable of remixing who..
I don't know if WotL took that into consideration the last time, but it seemed so to me.
[Ishan]
12th July 2005 06:27 UTC
um... is it too late for me to join in? My computer screwed up...but now i've got myself a new machine. I'll be happy to be counted in.
Warrior of the Light
12th July 2005 11:05 UTC
not too late at all
we've not even started.
As far as I'm concerned we start late August. (as said above)
For specific info/your opinion, check the forum on my website.
^..^
12th July 2005 14:59 UTC
Late august will be fine for me too! Though i most probably wont have much time then.
But i'll just start to make presets a week later (or earlier) then!
[Ishan]
13th July 2005 17:23 UTC
ok then. I'm in. :)
Shylent
1st August 2005 19:08 UTC
Can I submit my stuff as well?
Warrior of the Light
1st August 2005 20:14 UTC
As far as I'm concerned, sure.
JaVS_v2.5
2nd August 2005 03:23 UTC
may i join??
Warrior of the Light
2nd August 2005 19:59 UTC
Every member of this forum is welcome to.
Just know that if there are too many submissions, we'll have to cut the worst ones off.
I'm not saying that your work sucks in any way, but keep in mind that there will be a limited amount of presets in the final release.
Read more about how this will work on my forum.
Tuggummi
2nd August 2005 20:43 UTC
"Im not saying that your work sucks and im not saying that it doesn't, but it does."
lmao :blah:
Warrior of the Light
2nd August 2005 20:48 UTC
I tried avoiding sounding like that.
I just don't know his stuff that well. That's all.
All I'm saying (and meaning) is (also due to a rise in the amount of participants) that there will be a limit of the amout of presets. Read the above for this too.
This isn't visbot100
JaVS_v2.5
3rd August 2005 07:47 UTC
ya.. i know that!
this isn't visbot100
PAK-9
3rd August 2005 15:07 UTC
yes
this isn't visbot100
o_O
Tuggummi
3rd August 2005 16:03 UTC
this isn't visbot100
this isn't visbot100
this isn't visbot100
Polly wants a cracker!
^..^
3rd August 2005 16:38 UTC
use cracker with Polly the parrot... :weird:
Warrior of the Light
3rd August 2005 18:40 UTC
Blowing a parrot up with a firecracker?
Guys, you are one weird source for inspiration for presets.. :D
On second thought, let's not do it. I don't think it would look cool.
AVS wasn't meant to show red meat. UCD's speleology preset taught me that *very* well.
Tuggummi
3rd August 2005 19:42 UTC
Originally posted by Warrior of the LightGuess who gave him the idea? ;)
AVS wasn't meant to show red meat. UCD's speleology preset taught me that *very* well.
Warrior of the Light
3rd August 2005 20:22 UTC
Eeerm... Shabaviz?
MaTTFURY
4th August 2005 07:28 UTC
hehehehehehe :p (@UnConeD's Speology)
eheiney
11th August 2005 17:29 UTC
Status check, anyone?
I've got one preset that's about 90% done. All I need to do is find a cheaper(fps) way to achieve the color effects. The other preset I'm working on is still in its eariler stages, about 25% done.
I know we weren't going to 'officially' start until the end of the month, but I wanted to get a head start... plus I wouldn't have had any time later on, ie: school, work.
Warrior of the Light
1st September 2005 20:51 UTC
September hath begun!
The holidays are over, so I suppose everybody is back, and in some way able to read this..
You now have one month to email me your latest presets.
Also, we use this month to discuss how we will make WFC3 a succes for everyone.
About the judging theory that has been discussed, I suggest we wait with that until we're sure that we will have too many presets and mixes to form a good pack.
I'll keep you informed of who submited how many presets on my forum. (I can't edit my posts here after +2hours)
Want to join? Just mail (no more than) two of your latest presets to my gmail address.
Restrictions: you have to be a member on this board.
UnConeD
3rd September 2005 22:00 UTC
Speleology is nothing without the wonderful companion preset though: Ametytto (sp?).
eheiney
3rd September 2005 23:48 UTC
Ammetytto is even worse. At least with Speleology, you can look away for the first few seconds and then it's just a cool lookin' remix... that is, if only you hadn't seen the picture.
Tuggummi
4th September 2005 08:26 UTC
Originally posted by denkensiefursicGood luck at trying to find one :p
...that is, if only you hadn't seen the picture.
^..^
13th September 2005 15:58 UTC
Hope it's ok if i only contribute one preset?!
As long as i remember correctly, we said everyone should at least submit two presets, but i just don't have enough time to make two.
If it's all right, i'm going to send it to WotL as soon as it's finished....
Warrior of the Light
13th September 2005 18:29 UTC
Originally posted by Warrior of the LightI hate quoting myself...
Want to join? Just mail (no more than) two of your latest presets to my gmail address.
PAK-9
13th September 2005 19:19 UTC
whats the deadline? I forgot.
^..^
13th September 2005 20:50 UTC
i have end of september as a dedline in my mind. i'm not quite sure but i don't think it will be before that date. WotL should confirm that...
Originally posted by Warrior of the Light
Quote:
I hate quoting myself...
Btw, welcome back, ^..^Thanks WotL, now im quite relieved! Anyway, i'm glad i could find the time to do some AVS-stuff again!
Originally posted by Warrior of the Light
Want to join? Just mail (no more than) two of your latest presets to my gmail address.
Warrior of the Light
14th September 2005 22:05 UTC
End of the month.
eheiney
15th September 2005 01:13 UTC
Well so how is one this working now, did we decide? What happens when all the originals have been submitted? Were you going to submit them to your forum, WotL, for discussion and remixing? Will voting be taking place?
Warrior of the Light
15th September 2005 22:44 UTC
Voting will only take place if the amount of presets gets too large (which I'm hoping :p).
I'm thinking about a maximum of 30 presets in total. (Discussion goes here)
About the remixing.. I think the way we did WFC2 went rather well - every artist receives the presets (2+2=~4) from two other random artists and submits the best remixes.
If several people are only able to submit only one preset (losers ;p), then perhaps it should be done per three artists (1+2+1=~4). Other ideas are of course welcome. (please post them as a seperate thread on the other forum)
If there are too many presets, then we should indeed have some voting system. I'm not sure yet how that will happen, but I prefer to wait with thinking about that until the first deadline - then we'll know the amount of originals, and if that's lower than that of the previous compilations, then there'll be most likely no need to trim it down. If it's bigger, then we still have the second month to decide how to cut which one out.
But as long as it isn't necessary, I don't want to remove stuff.
I know I really wouldn't like it if someone chose to remove my stuff from a pack, and I guess it's the same for you guys.
But if we need to, we need to. (yea, I'm stating the obvious, I know)
Mr_Nudge
16th September 2005 16:36 UTC
i got one preset in..i hope i can get a second one in soon! how many entries so far wotl?
Mr_Nudge
16th September 2005 16:58 UTC
wow..i hope it picks up soon. i'll make another soon i hope and then i'll be getting started on V8
Mr_Nudge
17th September 2005 12:13 UTC
yeah.. i got another, it's not much, but it will do. i can't make anything else i have nothing going on in the way of creativity/inspiration. i just have this urge to write lots and lots and lot of meaningless crap. okay i'll stop now.
StevenRoy
19th September 2005 21:52 UTC
Count me in!
jheriko
25th September 2005 02:58 UTC
the likelyhood of me producing a preset is approaching zero i'm afraid.. :/
sorry guys.
eheiney
25th September 2005 03:45 UTC
it almost even seems the likelyhood of wfc3 being released is approaching zero.
less than one week left and we only have 3 presets? and two of them are mine! :(
StevenRoy
25th September 2005 09:09 UTC
That we know of. I've sent in my two. For all we know, several others may have submitted presets too, and it just hasn't been reflected yet in the official count on WotL's forum.
^..^
25th September 2005 13:13 UTC
I also got one preset ready that i'm definitely going to submit. But since the deadline isn't over yet i wanted to wait if i could finish a second one and submit two presets!
Tuggummi
25th September 2005 14:22 UTC
Uhm, so i need to get cracking up now?
^..^
25th September 2005 14:56 UTC
No, not really.
Wasn't supposed to amaze you in any way, but just as a short general info.
Tuggummi
25th September 2005 17:47 UTC
Durrr.... I meant that i should start making presets, because of the deadline closing up really fast and all :igor:
Warrior of the Light
25th September 2005 18:13 UTC
sorry for the delay.
status now: 6 presets from 3 artists, excluding mine
^..^
25th September 2005 20:44 UTC
sorry tug, i must've misunderstood your post then... :tinfoil:
eheiney
26th September 2005 00:45 UTC
So, get crackin' you guys!
...fucking slackers
:p
Warrior of the Light
4th October 2005 21:59 UTC
okay, here goes:
status after the first deadline
Today is October 4th, a few days after the deadline.
I received 9 presets from 5 different artists, +two from me and a remix from a previous compilaton.
That's 11 presets that can be put up for remixing.
Artists who have submitted their preset(s)
^..^
MrNudge
Boktor
StevenRoy
Denkensiefursich
Tuggummi
Warrior of the Light
Again, every artist recieves the presets from two other participating artists, meaning that everyone has about four presets to remix.
It's really a slim number of original presets, but if everyone submits two remixes, there'll be enough for a pack.
Tuggummi
4th October 2005 22:28 UTC
So what do you plan on setting the remix deadline for? End of this month? Or just a couple of weeks?
StevenRoy
4th October 2005 22:48 UTC
Yeah, that does sound rather slim.
Seems to me like it might be necessary (or at least a good idea) to extend that deadline by a week or two, in case some of the others here just need a little more time to get their presets ready and sent in. (After all, I'm sure we all know how much a person can be delayed by homework... or, even worse, work!)
^..^
4th October 2005 22:51 UTC
@Tug: Didn't you get a mail from WotL yet?
To me he said that the next deadline shall be the 31th of October (which is rather short for me atm, but i will just try my best). Well, we'll see then.
Anyway, what shall we do if someone else wants to contribute some presets after now? (I doubt that, but it still might happen...)
Warrior of the Light
4th October 2005 23:13 UTC
I've noticed the last two compilations that 98% of all submissions are submitted either within the first week or within five days before the deadline. A longer deadline makes artists lazy. Take pak-9 here for example (not a personal attack). First he forgets the deadline, later he also forgets to submit presets. Again, this is just an example, not a personal attack.
The next deadline will be the October 31st, 23:59 unless someone can give me a good explanation of how this extra time would be used/needed.
Think for yourself, not for others.
New submissions will be too late and will not be included, as the presets have already been shared.
I've waited 3 more days before spreading the presets only to give these people a chance.
PAK-9
5th October 2005 00:48 UTC
Just for the record I didnt forget, I just... didnt do any :|
No time/inclination/inspiration/whatever, sorry.
StevenRoy
5th October 2005 08:28 UTC
Fair enough.
...On to the remixing!
Tuggummi
5th October 2005 09:42 UTC
At the time i asked that question i hadn't checked my mail :p
But anyway, it's now all clear to me, clear as vodka!
To the remixmobile!
^..^
5th October 2005 11:19 UTC
hehe :D
Anyway, the deadline shall be fine for me too!
btw: What about the much dicussed voting to limit the packsize? I mean, since there most probably won't be so many presets in the end we don't really need that, or what do you say?
Warrior of the Light
5th October 2005 12:30 UTC
My thoughts:
If there are too many remixes after the next deadine, then I'll email the remixes to the participants vor voting within a specified short time (week?).
But then, my thoughts are worth just as much as anyone elses on this.
^..^
5th October 2005 12:42 UTC
I find that pretty funny: we were discussing about this thing during the whole summer, and in the end we might won't need it! :D
Anyway, im feeling that i was a bit too fast on this. Probably we should better wait until we know how many remixes there are. But if we'll need something to shrink the size i'd also say: let's make it as simple as possible.
qforce2
5th October 2005 19:53 UTC
If you still need presets, I can provide one. It's a remix that didn't make it into my pack, because it looked too similar to the original. However I think it's good enough and I just don't know what to do with it. I'd be grateful if you can find any use for it.
If you're interested, tell me where to submit.
Tuggummi
5th October 2005 19:59 UTC
Originally posted by Warrior of the LightNot to be mean or anything, but i hope WotL sticks to this, even if pak-9 makes jetwash II on october 29th. It's just not fair or courteous towards the people who did make it to the deadline.
New submissions will be too late and will not be included, as the presets have already been shared.
qforce2
6th October 2005 12:06 UTC
Alright, I accept that :up:
Raz
6th October 2005 16:42 UTC
Not seen any of these before now. Not got the time to avs much anymore but i've got a single preset if you want it for this.
Warrior of the Light
6th October 2005 17:47 UTC
Raz! Great to see you back here..
@Qforce, Raz:
Well, there is no way that you two can participate in the remixing part, that's for sure.
Also, I feel I would offend you and the others if I said I'd put them in as 'filler' if there wouldn't be enough presets.
@Everyone:
How about it if we'd put them up vor voting together with all other presets/remixes?
^..^
6th October 2005 19:06 UTC
Nah, i personnaly don't like that idea. Actually we had a deadline and it's unfair if we accept later submitted presets (i think tug already found the fitting words for this...). Besides, we discussed about the voting as an idea to limit down the packsize so why shall we vote when we need "filler"-presets?
StevenRoy
6th October 2005 21:55 UTC
Suppose we do this in two stages: First, one group (the on-time group) submits our presets (like we already did) and then remix each other's presets (like we're currently doing)... and then the second group (the latecomers) can submit their presets during November, then remix each other's presets in December, and then have them left out of the pack anyway because they suck. :D
Raz
6th October 2005 23:38 UTC
All this red tape is giving me a headache.
Tuggummi
7th October 2005 04:46 UTC
So WFC3 will come out, what? Next year?
I don't know about you, but im pretty anxious to get my stuff out :p
Let's just remix what we have here and play by that, no late stuff and maybe we'll get the pack out before christmas season when everyone will be busy anyway.
eheiney
7th October 2005 05:29 UTC
Tuggummi:As with ^..^, I must agree as well.
Not to be mean or anything, but i hope WotL sticks to this, even if pak-9 makes jetwash II on october 29th. It's just not fair or courteous towards the people who did make it to the deadline.
Raz:While I agree with Tug, if all others are reluctant for this to be put in this pack, you should either release it singly... or just send it to me. :D
Not got the time to avs much anymore but i've got a single preset if you want it for this.
Tuggummi:Yay! I'm not alone. I accidentally let a few earlier versions slip out through a few select mediums.
I don't know about you, but im pretty anxious to get my stuff out :p
^..^
7th October 2005 15:18 UTC
I have to second all that too!
Let's try to finish the pack on our own. Either it will be great as ever ;) or it will terribly fail. I think we have to find that out!
Besides, i also can't wait any longer before my stuff gets out! :p
Warrior of the Light
7th October 2005 16:20 UTC
Originally posted by ^..^[yoda]Try not, do[/yoda]
Let's try to finish the pack on our own.
^..^
7th October 2005 16:32 UTC
Originally posted by Warrior of the LightDid i miss anything? :weird:
[yoda]Try not, do[/yoda]
Tuggummi
7th October 2005 18:37 UTC
Goes the original like this: "Try not, do, or do not, there is no try."
Star Wars from, it is :D
^..^
7th October 2005 21:46 UTC
Sorry, im not such a great starwars fan. I have only seen them in German.
Anyway, thanks tu tug i finally got the connection... :D
eheiney
8th October 2005 09:14 UTC
As a big a nerd as I am, I've never even seen star wars. I saw a few bits and pieces here and there, but not enough to understand the quote either. I did know it was from star wars though, cause everyone's heard of yoda. The only other character I know of is that thing that looks like a big bear/dog/gorilla, who just kind of goes something like "Wacghagacha" and that's all he says. :D
Warrior of the Light
9th October 2005 14:00 UTC
yea, shame on me for not checking the official line.
Tugg, you're right again :hang:
Tuggummi
9th October 2005 16:19 UTC
Im always right, and as soon as you succumb to my rightfullness the easier it is for me to devour your soul, erhm, i mean easier for you to accept my total and utter domination on the world
...
Damn, i did it again, didn't i? :hang:
Tuggummi
14th October 2005 11:22 UTC
Just occured to me, is anyone making a intro? Or is there one even planned to be?
Warrior of the Light
14th October 2005 13:28 UTC
StevenRoy has also offered this (on my forum). But if you feel like you can beat him, go ahead. Or, better, team up.
Tuggummi
14th October 2005 17:47 UTC
Nah, i don't want to compete anyone, if he wants to do it, then he can go ahead :)
I was just offering in case none was planned or no one hadn't volunteered.
Tuggummi
31st October 2005 16:57 UTC
It's the last day of October! (well atleast in Finland...)
What's the status? Is it good to go? :D
StevenRoy
31st October 2005 19:43 UTC
From here:
Submitted remixes: 6 from 2 artists.Well, I know four of those remixes are mine, and someone else got two sent in... The numbers are probably going to jump, too, in the next update.
last update: October 27th
Warrior of the Light
31st October 2005 20:00 UTC
Just have some difficulties with an email from denkensiefursich.
it's the same attachmentloss again as in an earlier compilation I think..
It seems only to occur with this gmail account though..
Boktor (what is it?!) sent his stuff in right after dsfs, but I did get his remixes in without any problems.
copypaste:
Submitted originals: 13 from 7 artists. (final)
Submitted remixes: 11(+1) from 4(+1) artists:
- Tuggummi
- Stevenroy
- Boktor
- Warrior of the Light
- (Denkensiefursich)
last update: October 31st
Also submitted:
1 remix from an earlier compilation.
1 Intro
Tuggummi
31st October 2005 20:02 UTC
Well i guess it harms no one if i say that those other two are my remixes.
I just hope WotL updates in the next 1-2 days or maybe even compiles it if everything comes together, im pretty anxious to see the pack ;)
^..^
31st October 2005 22:53 UTC
Me either! :D
btw: sorry for not contributing any remixes this time. The past weeks (=first weeks of new semester) were pretty strenuous to me. More than i thought they would. :hang:
eheiney
1st November 2005 05:10 UTC
That goes for me too, ^..^. My school work is killing me! I really wish I would have been able to submit more than one remix, but time just wasn't on my side this past month. As it is, I'm not even entirely pleased with the one remix that I have, but it's better than nothing I suppose. :shrug: :sigh: :frown:
Warrior of the Light
1st November 2005 20:25 UTC
Stop bitching all and rather get WFC3
BECAUSE IT'S OUT!
Created with PimpBot2.1.5..
The latest version gave me a [close] button where I wanted the [install] button
The previous beta didn't include the bitmaps (I don't want tuggummi to get mad again, my butt's still hurting from the last time :cry: )
So I went for 2.1.5 with the gvm ape in the zipfile.
Thanks go to Hboy for beta-testing the installer
Let's hope we don't get too many n00bs asking for 'teh missing monkey'..
StevenRoy
1st November 2005 20:49 UTC
Ah, school... my old arch-nemesis...
Yathosho
1st November 2005 20:54 UTC
Originally posted by Warrior of the Lightworks again, accidently deleted a line :rolleyes:
Created with PimpBot2.1.5..
The latest version gave me a [close] button where I wanted the [install] button
Warrior of the Light
1st November 2005 21:06 UTC
*sighs much deeper than denkensiefursich*
installer rebuilt and uploaded, works now as far as I can tell.
@all:
Report any bugs you encounter (also if you don't) so that I can safely submit it to wa.com
Tuggummi
1st November 2005 21:14 UTC
Originally posted by Warrior of the LightThat's right, bitch. That's how it goes down, in Tuggummi's Town :cool:
(I don't want tuggummi to get mad again, my butt's still hurting from the last time :cry: )
Warrior of the Light
1st November 2005 21:17 UTC
Originally posted by Tuggummiyou're being addicted again... :p
*goes off to write a review*
^..^
1st November 2005 21:36 UTC
Cool! :eek: Great work everbody! :up:
One question though: why did we have all those discussions about preset-ratings and stuff during the whole summer? ;) :p
*me is too tired to write review atm*
so just on thing btw: tug i love your neon spray remix, it's so much better than my original... *envy* :hang:
Now, when do we start with WFC4?! ;)
//edit: hmm, way too many smilies there, don't you think? Must be because i'm so excited again! :D
Tuggummi
1st November 2005 22:40 UTC
Originally posted by ^..^I still like the original more myself, weird :igor:
so just on thing btw: tug i love your neon spray remix, it's so much better than my original... *envy* :hang:
Warrior of the Light
1st November 2005 22:48 UTC
Originally posted by ^..^I know you were kidding but still: (I hate copypasting text)
Now, when do we start with WFC4?! ;)
PAK-9
1st November 2005 23:24 UTC
Great stuff guys :up:
^..^
2nd November 2005 13:59 UTC
Originally posted by TuggummiWeird indeed, but i'll agree... :D
I still like the original more myself, weird :igor:
Let's just say we both rock :blah:
Tuggummi
12th November 2005 17:33 UTC
Btw. has this pack been submited to winamp? I've been checking the AVS category here ever since you posted it on DA and it hasn't yet appeared there, i thought they had the whole review system speeded a while back?
Doggy Dog
14th November 2005 09:26 UTC
Tug, it has, and I reviewed it (you guys prolly won't like the review much, but I was as objective as possible).
Anyway, we have some issues with the database, and it has come to the annoying fact that nothing we've reviewed in the past couple of days, skins or plugins, is on the site. Those issues will probably be fixed on Monday morning, which is kinda now and today, so check in a couple of hours or tomorrow.
JaVS_v2.5
14th November 2005 16:10 UTC
it's late.. damn it!~ :hang:
Tuggummi
14th November 2005 20:53 UTC
A huge, no, enormous disappointment.Burn him on a stake! :mad:
cyborg010
14th November 2005 21:17 UTC
HOORAY FOR XOR
JFASI
14th November 2005 21:33 UTC
Amen!!!
XOR is great, yet so... bizzare.
Warrior of the Light
14th November 2005 22:03 UTC
Thanks for getting it online to begin with.
I won't flame you for the review, you're absolutely right if you say that the overall quality is lower than WFC2. But then, keep in mind that the toppers are missing and there are a lot of new people.
I say that those people did an outstanding job to prove themselves.
What I did miss in this compilation were mostly the missing remixes. Especially Tugg's preset was a good preset for remixing, but unfortunately noone did.
Personally I'd have prefered it if you had reviewed it as a new pack, and not as one-in-the-line-of, since half of the people are different, but that's just my 2ct
I fully agree with the ratings though.
/added: i usually hate xor
StevenRoy
14th November 2005 23:56 UTC
Me too. There are some cool things that can be done with XOR, but way too many uncool things. (I thought the subtle XOR effect in "The Convicts" was a nice touch, though.)
I also would've liked to see more remixes, but it's not too late; some WFC3 remixes can go in WFC4, for example, right?
I'll also agree that colour is a very subjective thing. For example, I noticed one negative comment on DA specifically about the colours in my "Convection Conviction" remix. I loved those wild "hot and cold" colours, like fireballs in a freezer. Perhaps they were too wild for most people, though? Similarly, I put the framerate limiter in "Apple To My Eye" partially to mimic the limited processor power of the Apple II, but mostly just because I thought it looked better with it than without it. I spent a while on that decision, and I stand by it.
In retrospect, I could've used "Apple To My Eye" as the background for the title. Now that would've been something! (In fact, I probably could do something like that for WFC4, but I've already got another idea...)
Anyway, despite the comments in that review, four stars seems pretty good to me. Still, let's hope next time will be better!
eheiney
15th November 2005 00:51 UTC
Ouch.
I'll agree that this is certainly a fair rating, going so far as to even agreeing that a 4 is a bit high, in respect to the quality of presets. I hope not to add insult to injury, but I personally didn't enjoy it nearly as much as the previous compilations either.
That said, I never thought of this as a pack which would portray the best works in the community, more as a pack which protrayed our individual styles to the greatest extent. We're not going to please everyone, by a long shot. And if you're doing avs for the comments and the praise, you're in it for the wrong reasons. I create presets because I enjoy it. I like working out the problems encountered, as well as being able to express myself through this means as an artform. In that respect, I give this pack a 5, as well as a favorite on deviantART.
Now, in response the XOR comments, if anyone was referring to my preset (if not, ignore this paragraph :p), I thought it added a nice touch for the artistic side of it. I spent a few days trying to keep it real subtle, as I usually hate it as well.
Finally, I agree about some of the color schemes as well, but, as with others, I agree that it's subjective. Again, however, if it pleases the artist, that's what should matter.
Anyway, through all of this, I'm still very much looking forward to WFC4. Let's hope it's a whizbang. ;)
JFASI
15th November 2005 01:03 UTC
Personally, It's a good pack, but it does sort of disappoint. I was expecting to be blown sockless by the visuals and the sheer "How DO they do it?" factor. Granted, I don't plan to release a rival pack anytime soon, but I was expecting more jaws dropping (too good a reputation could be a bad thing).
Fork me on GitHub
Originally posted by Warrior of the Light you have an alternative then how to shrink the ammount of remixes? well, if it's just that: set up a maximum limit for every participant! E.g. two remixes at the most or something... |