psh

13th December 2004 12:58 UTC

BlurAVS
First ever release of AVS's i've done...
Dont criticize me too much :)
And If you wanna use it, you're free... just tell me :)

mysterious_w

13th December 2004 15:37 UTC

Some of these are ok, but a couple are seizure induciiiiiinnnnnnnggggggggggggggggggdsoinhtesnhdflgndgh

^..^

14th December 2004 17:27 UTC

i for my part don't like those flickering presets, but the flowers are nice.

Warrior of the Light

14th December 2004 20:02 UTC

Originally posted by ^..^
but the flowers are nice.

^..^

14th December 2004 21:16 UTC

unfortunately not ;)
honestly, the code isn't that bad.. :)

Warrior of the Light

14th December 2004 23:03 UTC

PSH, around here, there goes a simple rule: "give credit where credit is due" - If you use something from someone else, name him and the preset it came from in your comment.

(also, check if they don't forbid to use their stuff at all as some might do)

further, good stuff. Keep it up!

psh

15th December 2004 15:30 UTC

The superscope is a modified preset... so credit to nullsoft...

mysterious_w

15th December 2004 17:08 UTC

But who made the preset which the scope was in? That is who you should ggive credit to.

^..^

15th December 2004 22:06 UTC

let me guess: your scope bases on the superscope example called "exploding daisy", right? I was wondering all the time where i have seen that code before and accidently i just came to it.

So, to whom should this credit go? I think no one really knows who made those "built-in" examples that come along with the superscope, movement, dynamic-movement etc.:confused:

Warrior of the Light

15th December 2004 22:54 UTC

owww. my bad then. Are those builtins still using 3.14159265358979 then? (shorter, I know.. I only know the 14 digit version (really) ) How ancient... that's what we started with indeed, then came pi=acos(-1) and now we have $pi

^..^

16th December 2004 16:24 UTC

it seems as if those "builtins" have been revised since the "old days", cause they're using $PI now.

MaTTFURY

18th December 2004 10:30 UTC

hmmm nice work if may say so myself ;) but i know for one... these are all edits... although i dont mind some... i dont like the inversions... :p

psh

18th December 2004 20:00 UTC

Every single one has been made from scratch... i used some preset stuff... but overall i did it, and havent edited...

mysterious_w

18th December 2004 20:05 UTC

Yeah, so the bits that you did use, whose were they? That is what we are saying you dimwit.

MaTTFURY

19th December 2004 02:07 UTC

your determined to find out aren't you =P

^..^

19th December 2004 10:38 UTC

hm i'm wondering. what do you mean mysterious_w? Earlier this thread we found out that the supercopes are taken from the built in examples (when you click the "Load example..." button in the ssc config box). And he didn't use anything else creditable, did he?

MaTTFURY

20th December 2004 03:34 UTC

ohh well...