semaj_mc

19th November 2003 09:26 UTC

Titled versions
Titled versions

hungryskull

19th November 2003 23:01 UTC

Here is a review of your presets:

Checkerballs - N00bish and kinda ugly.

Dot Derets - Repetitive, Boring, but not terribly n00bish. You used a few pieces of code.

DoubleDosageDisco - N00bish and boring.

double-dosage-disko-trippymix - Same as above but ugly.

glidersnatch - Ugly.

goldenrodsx2 - Boring and apart from the movement, n00bish.

IDiedangonetohell - Quite n00bish and ugly.

Ivediedandgonetoheaven - Same as above.

Jerygs - N00bish.

Jigglypuffinxv5 - N00bish and ugly.

MerryXmasRMX - Less n00bish.

midnightgems - Not very nice looking and not very music responsive.

newwierdness - Yes it is wierd. But n00bish.

Osostar - Not very interesting. The DDM looks similar to the default one.

purplebars3 - Boring and n00bish.

astralflowers - Boring. N00bish.

These were all n00bish. Some were ugly. Try Some Superscopes and DM's. Some of the presets needed more music response.

semaj_mc

20th November 2003 07:09 UTC

Than ks still got work to do
Glad of the response I'm sure you all get overwhelmed with presets from every Tom, Dick, and Harry, Hi! I'm Harry..but anyway now that I've got some familiarity with how movements work I'm going to start work on superscopes, Plenty of info here, now if I can find the time..


semaj_mc

P.s. what's the census,are they n00b because of how they look or how there constructed?

P.p.s "The only bad presets are the one's watched listening to bad music...." heard it on a thread, liked the idea..:hang:

gaekwad2

21st November 2003 10:14 UTC

They look nOObish because they look like the stuff most people come up with when they first try making presets. Which wouldn't be a problem but there are just sooo many of them around. It would take an absolute fucking genius to make something new just using the standard effects.
But keep it up, keep reading them threads and you'll pick up some skills sooner than you think! :up:

Pixelcraft

22nd November 2003 16:07 UTC

yes, yes, they aren't the best like rest of the best, some people might tell you to give it a rest but when you learn from the best you become like the rest.

in other words - you can figure out avs by checking out piR's tutorial, reading atero's primer, the FAQ, and sometimes by just taking a dive into the inner workings of other people's presets.

btw hungryskull - I love your reviews :p

Montana

22nd November 2003 17:24 UTC

yup, this is some n00b:y presets, but i can see some potential, keep doing avs and you might even be as good as unconed (not really but suprise me)