- AVS
- Presets for WA5
Archive: Presets for WA5
Rovastar
13th September 2003 21:33 UTC
Presets for WA5
Now I do not know if this will happen or not. But it is one of the things I would like to see.
A collection of the best of presets people have created over teh past couple of years. :)
A new newpicks as it were.
Now I have no idea how we can organise it but mayeb if we post our 3 favourite presets (I know it is difficult but we could have thousands otherwise). Maybe too get feedback from the DA ppl
Now it is too easy to decend into a DM-fest if you know what I mean (all DM-tastic presets :) ). Please try and show variety and diversoity, sound responsivness, etc that AVS can create, :)
Now if we keep this thread for presets only!!
Names of authors - preset name and a zip please.
Discussion can be made in another thread if you chooses so no I hate that preset blah, blah, blah.
Please don't just pimp your own stuff. In fact I am tempted to say do not include your own stuff and just nominate others. Yes lets do that. 3 other peoples presets. ok :)
Please repeat other peoples choices too so we get a sense of popularity/numbers.
Think long and hard it is so not easy just to pick 3 and we should have a few weeks before the new version of WA. :)
And hopefully we can collate them and select the most popular ones for newpicks2. :);)
Post away.
Jaak
13th September 2003 22:26 UTC
UnConeD - Zero-G Maze 3
Jheriko - UnConeD - VJ Chmutov
Fsk - zvedka
Nic01
13th September 2003 22:31 UTC
14:36:24 <Nic01> hmmh
14:36:36 <Nic01> 1st preset oughtta be something staying true to AVS, something based on sound
14:36:44 <Nic01> 2nd oughtta be the more calming, screensaver-type preset
14:37:07 <Nic01> 3rd oughtta be a mold of the two (DM presets tend to satisfy this)
*ahem*
What about APEs though?
I suggest a 9-preset system instead of 3, that's a little *too* tight to summarize the world of AVS.
mikm
13th September 2003 22:40 UTC
Y'know, if this happens, there will be SO many rips of these presets. If you look at the presets, I've seen tons of rips of the newpicks, the same thing with a couple modifications. The people in charge of removing rips did nothing about it.
justin
14th September 2003 00:21 UTC
This is a great idea, but maybe you should only put your own X in, because otherwise we gotta go get permission from people. That is, if we want to include it in Winamp5.
Also, let's say no APE use in them. :) Maybe we'll include some
APEs in the final version, but I dunno...
-Justin
anubis2003
14th September 2003 01:00 UTC
In order to put in some of the best ones, we will need things like texer, colormap, and convo filter. These are essentials for the best.
My favorites:
UnConeD - Radiant
fsk - cube
el-VIS - avsstein remixed
3 just isn't enough!!! I want to put some Jheriko and tuggummi too.
anubis2003
14th September 2003 01:02 UTC
Dammit. Attachment:
Nic01
14th September 2003 04:05 UTC
This is the only non-APE preset I can get in a flash (Second to Circular, but it returns Preset Too Large error when I make the edits to eliminate the APEs upon saving)
sidd
14th September 2003 04:08 UTC
If your going to put in some APE's with the release, the following are by far the most useful ones. Nowadays, youll rarely find a preset that doesnt use one of these:
Convulation fliter - Tom Holden
Color Map - UnConeD
Texer - UnConeD
There are a few others, less versatile, but still usfull in their own ways:
Channel Shift - UnConeD
Color Reduction - UnConeD
Video Delay - Tom Holden (vital APE for live vis-ing)
Multiplier - Unconed (just an extension of fast brightness, can be replaced by variouse other tools. eg color modifier)
Multi-Filter - Jheriko (sme as above)
[Ishan]
14th September 2003 07:51 UTC
i second sidd here, i hardly make any preset without ape's.
Deamon
14th September 2003 10:22 UTC
so do I, I almost always use the colormap by now. As for my favourites, I really don't know. I truly love some of the work of fsk, his cube etc. I also liked a lot of UnConeD and Tugg. I really can't tell which are my favourites. Some names:
UnConeD - ants in your pants
UnConeD - Moonbuggy
Raz - Satanic
Jheriko & UnConeD - VJ Chmutov <- this is certainly a top 3 one :)
Tuggummi - the worm-o-rama series (all of them)
etc. etc. I can't make a selection. There are too much good ones around.
Nobody selected me as their favourite? :( (:p j/k I know I suck) (though I don't like it...., I'll try not to suck)
UnConeD
14th September 2003 13:07 UTC
moonbuggy is not a final preset btw, that was just a stupid tech demo.
Yathosho
14th September 2003 17:51 UTC
how boring, why not some exclusive presets instead?
including the APEs would be a good thing, especially those who weren't ever or hardly updated (will there be a bugfixed texer anytime soon?).
S-uper_T-oast
15th September 2003 03:42 UTC
I say we use exclusive presets. I don't see what would be so hard to make some easy scoping/dm/colorful/reactive presets to showcase what AVS is best at.
Tuggummi
15th September 2003 09:13 UTC
Hmm...
I don't have the presets with me, but from my upcoming pack "Extra Dimension" i could probably come up with 2 presets that don't use APE's.
"Cubed to death"
"Tanssiva Mies 3"
And then maybe as the 3rd preset "Plastic Avenue" from "Innovation!" could be one...
Tho i don't know will they work in the new AVS version, because i haven't tested yet. (i don't want to use wa3/wa5/wa2.9x... :cry: )
Tuggummi
16th September 2003 06:20 UTC
Well i did take 3 presets from my last packs & upcoming pack and made them APEless (they were easy to make since they had only 1 or 2 ape's per preset)
So here is my 3 presets for the winamp 5 newpicks, they're not exclusive as yathosho there suggested, but they are some of my favorites & best without APE's :)
So here is my X for the permission to use these presets in the newpicks for the wa5 release (that is of course if you want to)
UnConeD
16th September 2003 13:40 UTC
A little voice told me that you do not need to remove the following APEs from your presets:
- Multiplier
- Channel Shift
- Color Reduction
And probably Color map too. ;)
Jaak
16th September 2003 14:08 UTC
but.. but...
TEXER
:(
Deamon
16th September 2003 20:56 UTC
People, please all remember that the newpicks cannot be hard-to-make presets. All newbies with hardly any or no expierence with AVS who view it the first time have to get the idea 'HEY! I can do this :D'. Without a shitload of simple stuff this won't happen anymore, and the chance on new blood is about zero then. If people really want some heavy-neatlooking stuff, they'll just download the packs from the plugin pages on winamp.com. Though sure there can be some really kickass presets, so they also think 'AVS is endless and superior!'.
Just some of my thoughts. It would just suck so hard when the AVS community would slowly dissapear because people are just frightened to start using something totally new, which can be very, very easy in the beginning.
UnConeD
16th September 2003 21:40 UTC
Daemon: I doubt it. I've been digging around online communities exploring whether or not an influx of advanced work discourages amateurs.
In my experience, most people are simply busy creating stuff for themselves, toying around and enjoying the fact that they are making something, even if the end result is hideous (e.g. check The Sims custom-furniture for a horror show of amateur photoshopping).
The ones that are really into it will soon become more advanced as long as people don't shrug them off too hard (i.e. getting the message across that you can't learn everything in 5 minutes).
anubis2003
17th September 2003 05:18 UTC
Yeah - the newpicks are there to drag them into AVS - you want to amaze them at the 1337n355 of AVS. They will learn on their own - I know I didn't really look at others code until after I had been AVSing for a while - and when I did, I knew to not go for something amazingly advanced.
When people first see AVS, they will immediately go to download more if they really like it. Then they will start experimenting.
Tuggummi
17th September 2003 06:29 UTC
- Multiplier
- Channel Shift
- Color Reduction
And probably Color map too. ;)
Oh how lucky me, because i needed the convolution ape :p
Tuggummi
17th September 2003 12:29 UTC
Originally posted by deamon
Tuggummi - the worm-o-rama series (all of them)
The worm-o-rama wasn't a series, it was one preset that
some people liked to remix a bit too much :rolleyes: There was originally just one preset. (i felt like i had to point this out...:p)
Nic01
18th September 2003 00:29 UTC
Hmm...
I suggest the top 10 AVS KO Tournament 2 for the newpicks (or the top presets up to that point, in case we don't finish soon enough ;))
For 2nd edition of newpicks2, probably a sort of AVSers' choice (and admin choice...) of either overall presets or AVS KO Tour 2.
Still, with our insane bipolaristic set of judges, I think it's a bad idea...
S-uper_T-oast
18th September 2003 03:44 UTC
I don't know if the AVS Tourny 2 would be a good showing of AVS. A lot of people are not participating in it for one thing, and it does show some of AVS's versatility, I don't know if it is an accurate representation of what we can do with this new version of AVS since it is not being used, ie-larger amount of variables, global variables, Color Modifier.
Tuggummi
18th September 2003 09:42 UTC
I agree that the Tournament presets aren't actually "the best of AVS", because despite the fact that you are trying to "out do" each other, i still doubt these are your best works, we all know we keep our best works for our own packs and not post them on such irrelevant things as a AVS Tournament :rolleyes:
Besides, not everyone is participating in it...
anubis2003
18th September 2003 14:46 UTC
I agrees to Tuggummi.
Despite everyone's hopes, the tournaments don't always churn out the greatest presets.
skupers
18th September 2003 19:26 UTC
I made 8 exclusive remixes for newpicks. I also tried not to focus too much on the very well known avs creators.
yathosho - fabric (skupers remix) uses colormap
horse-fly - jinx (skupers remix) uses colormap, multiplier and convolution filter
If those APE's are a problem, you can leave those two presets out.
NemoOrange
18th September 2003 20:44 UTC
Hey, how about some presets that don't suck FPS!!!
I mean, we all know that the Wacko stuff is great & all, but we have to consider putting in some visualizations that can appeal to everyone, not just techies & programmers or whatever. Also, newpics should be accessible to newbies since this will be their first introduction to AVS. If we put on a bunch of complex presets, they'll never be able to grasp the simple concepts that lie behind the visualizations.
Raz
18th September 2003 20:55 UTC
I tried to choose three of tuggummi's presets but it's impossible, there are so many amazing presets in the collection. Too many different great effects to choose just three. I doubt i can choose.
skupers
18th September 2003 21:39 UTC
Originally posted by NemoOrange
Hey, how about some presets that don't suck FPS!!!
I mean, we all know that the Wacko stuff is great & all, but we have to consider putting in some visualizations that can appeal to everyone, not just techies & programmers or whatever. Also, newpics should be accessible to newbies since this will be their first introduction to AVS. If we put on a bunch of complex presets, they'll never be able to grasp the simple concepts that lie behind the visualizations.
I agree, but there also have to be presets that show AVS at it's best.
anubis2003
19th September 2003 04:52 UTC
I tried to pick a couple that weren't huge framerate suckers.
They all run fast on my pc. And by fast I mean ~35FPS at 400x400.
Tuggummi
19th September 2003 06:16 UTC
Hmm... even tho i selected quite fps sucker presets as my own "newpicks" , i agree with nemo, the newpicks has always been know for their speed. But im having a really hard time with the APEless concept, it's so damn hard to make great presets with the standard AVS effects and not only that, the APE's usually speed up the preset a lot...
Give me Convolution APE and i could probably give you some fps friendly presets :)
Deamon
19th September 2003 08:28 UTC
APE-less preset for WA5:
PAK-9
19th September 2003 23:53 UTC
Format...
Are you going to make it like newpicks, in that there will be lots by one artist or will you just have a big mix of different artists?
If its the 'lots by one artist' I think tug should definately be in there.
skupers
20th September 2003 09:44 UTC
Re: Format...
Originally posted by PAK-9
Are you going to make it like newpicks, in that there will be lots by one artist or will you just have a big mix of different artists?
If its the 'lots by one artist' I think tug should definately be in there.
I think it should be a mix of a lot of artists for more variety. I was actually thinking of something like the Deskmod series.
[Ishan]
20th September 2003 16:29 UTC
Originally posted by Nic01
Hmm...
I suggest the top 10 AVS KO Tournament 2 for the newpicks (or the top presets up to that point, in case we don't finish soon enough ;))
For 2nd edition of newpicks2, probably a sort of AVSers' choice (and admin choice...) of either overall presets or AVS KO Tour 2.
Still, with our insane bipolaristic set of judges, I think it's a bad idea...
:rolleyes:
horse-fly
21st September 2003 06:56 UTC
how about elvis or tonic, don't make the newpicks pure 3d, show the winamp downloaders somthing different then overdone 3d presets
Edit:
Skupers: if the apes end up being a big problem, you can just use the original preset to nominate
Jaak
21st September 2003 09:52 UTC
demmit! most of my presets use convo...
[Ishan]
21st September 2003 14:26 UTC
and most of mine use CMa.
Tuggummi
21st September 2003 15:01 UTC
you do not need to remove the following APEs from your presets:
- Multiplier
- Channel Shift
- Color Reduction
And probably Color map too.
:rolleyes:
jheriko
22nd September 2003 01:20 UTC
I think it would be much better if the whole avs community banded together and made a new newpicks from scratch with just one preset from each artist involved in addition to a small collection of existing presets. Before you all boo and crush my idea into dust let me explain my reasoning by way of advantages and disadvantages
Advantages
- You end up with a wide sample of all of avs, demonstrating many different styles and techniques and showing different levels of technical competence
- Fewer people will hate/be irritated by all of the newpicks
- We could collect a faily large amount of original presets very quickly since everyone only has to make one
- We can show the new effects and capabilities of AVS because every preset will be new and made using the new version of AVS
- First time AVS users (and existing ones possibly) will be exposed to a larger number of avs artists, this makes the community look bigger and better as well as providing users with a fairly good list of names to look up when they want more.
- People won't feel so left out by not getting their presets picked amongst our favorites
- Some of us (I would anyway) may want to make a preset that specifically uses the new features heavily to provide a good example for 'learners' + to show off the power of AVS
- Newer presets tend to better... evolution innit
Disadvantages- You may end up with a few really bad presets or maybe even a couple of really similar presets
- We wont be able to fill it with lots of Whacko and EL-VIS and such
- We all would need to make an avs preset... I've noticed that I can make a preset in a time range from 30 mins to 30 days, so it could take some time to gather a large collection
If one preset each is a bit extreme then maybe two, plus I think it would be a good idea to get some of the noobs in on this, that way the newnewpicks will appeal to them and us.
:)
sidd
22nd September 2003 03:57 UTC
i think its an uber idea
that way noone will be able to gloa0: "100k @ m3!!1!!1 1 got 10 preezts in n00pix! w00t!" etc..
:|
And i think it would be a good insentive, everyone will be prety keen to make nice looking presets if they know the whole world is gonna see them.
anubis2003
22nd September 2003 04:17 UTC
Eh, I don't like the idea. But that may just be me
Tuggummi
22nd September 2003 06:50 UTC
This is problematic indeed, i mean how we are going to make the "newpicks" with avs2.7 to the publishing of 2.7 if it is published the first time with the final version of wa5. This is a problem because something you made with pre3 might not work in pre4 or in the final version. (i've said this atleast 10 times in various places by now... :igor: )
anubis2003
22nd September 2003 06:54 UTC
I agree to tuggummi. We can't make a newpicks until the final version comes out - by then, we probably won't have time before Winamp 5 comes out and it gets released to the general public.
We need to just go with existing stuff - sure WA5 will have some cool stuff, but it won't make a huge difference in preset quality.
I also have said that we shouldn't make too many presets using 2.7 stuff until the final comes out - that would be a big pain if a lot of stuff got changed.
skupers
22nd September 2003 16:18 UTC
I thought my mixes were pretty varied :( .
fsk
22nd September 2003 18:23 UTC
I like jherikos plan. Dont know about this lets wait thing but Im definetly for deversity.
sidd
22nd September 2003 23:08 UTC
i dont see much point in waiting.. i cant imagne that avs2.7 wont be backward compatible. That would be just stupid.. Whas more, there has been no indication to suggest it from justin.
horse-fly
24th September 2003 00:57 UTC
honestly, just because these presets <b>could</b> be released with wa5 and avs2.7 doesn't mean that they <b>must</b> use the new components.
diversity is probably a great step for new users of winamp, as it would allow people to see the potential of a completely user defined visual program. But while not always the most technical presets, the people over at nullsoft do the best job of diversity. Many of you have already picked a style, and nothing will take you out of it, but the thing is that if i were a new user, i wouldn't want to see 30 something presets of 3D ideas that, for the most part, are rather similiar.
You as a society have placed yourself in a paradigm where everything must use snazzy DM and beyond complicated SSC. Honestly, i don't believe that most of you see the beauty of simplicity, of changing your style to a more conceptual one. There are a few exceptions out there, but for the most part, you focus on the mathmatical pieces rather than realizing that AVS is supposed to be art.
Sorry for rambling, but just a thought from someone who's been working with the program for about 4 years now.
~Horse-Fly
anubis2003
24th September 2003 01:33 UTC
Well said, HF, but complexity can make even better presets.
There are people who do really simple presets that are awesome, but then some people can make some of the most visually stunning complex presets that I can imagine. Neither is really better, IMO. I am personally better at doing more complex ones - I don't have enough of an artistic touch to make something simple look really nice like some people do. The ones that use crazy code are actually easier for me to make - I have a very mathematical mind.
We should try to get a mix - show the full spectrum of AVS presets.
Deamon
24th September 2003 08:47 UTC
I totally agree with Jheriko, the idea is great. If we're gonna do this, count me in :D
Yathosho
25th September 2003 09:55 UTC
Originally posted by Horse-Fly
You as a society have placed yourself in a paradigm where everything must use snazzy DM and beyond complicated SSC...
..and the same boring cubes other people already did a zillion times like 2 years ago :p
i find jheriko's a very good one. looks like the best solution, only egomanics wouldn't like it.
Tuggummi
26th September 2003 08:02 UTC
..and the same boring cubes other people already did a zillion times like 2 years ago
hahah, look who's talking :p I know of 2 certain remixes who both were made from cube presets ;)
I... I can't decide which side to "fall in"... I have enjoyed making 3D presets for my next pack, but at the moment it feels like agony to make those complex things. Sometimes heavy coding is fun (for me this means lots& lots of simple things used together), but i also enjoy making simple things. But i think you have to know atleast some code even to do the conceptual pieces, face it rotoblitter just doesn't do it anymore, it's so boring & monotenous.
sidd
26th September 2003 08:51 UTC
well.. ive only really been at it for less than a year.. but the way i work has always been: idea>thought>code (with a whole bunch of pullinmg out hair in the meantime.. sometimes my presets are very simple, because they didnt need to be complex to achieve the original idea. Some use all sorts of crazy junky code, and others are just plain fucked up (the whole unicycle ordeal).
anyways.. my point was something like: lets go with j's idea, and concentrate on making a bunch of presets that show diversity.. demonstrate everyones differnt styles.. and ARNT stupidly complicated just for the sake of looking all geeky and clever. Lets just make some uber presets..
let me know if that made any sense. Im a bit sloshed right now.. this room feels like its tilted 90o.. X_x
MMMMMMmmmmmmm...
jheriko
26th September 2003 14:17 UTC
I would think that 2.7 is bound to be backwardly compatible with the pre-releases, even if newer features demanded that the file format change I doubt it would be hard to add back compatibility since it will have to load 2.5 presets too, it makes good sense.
Zevensoft
26th September 2003 15:25 UTC
You can use this, no APE's used. And it shows a hint towards a way of making a DM torus by bending the rays ;)
PS. I'm drunk.
Zevensoft
26th September 2003 15:56 UTC
ps, i suk @ avs
anubis2003
26th September 2003 16:09 UTC
That could be an awesome preset - it's really weird how it's an impossible setup. Just needs some music responsiveness.
Tuggummi
2nd October 2003 12:13 UTC
So what is the plan? Do we stick to the original and each post 3 presets with no APE's (except what might be included in). Or do we break apart from this and make our own "newpicks" pack which we then publish outside the actual wa5 release? Or what? :igor: Im so very confused... and scared :eek: :confused:
shabaviz55
3rd October 2003 12:11 UTC
This is great a idea please check my creation in my signature.
Top of them are: Persian Style, NOUR-e-OMID, FUTURE MIX, TIME OUT.
Punkers
4th October 2003 07:03 UTC
Alt-iii here:
I feel bad for the noobs that DL the new WA5. They won't be exposed to my brilliant artwork.. Why? because winamp.com only accepts pimped avs files. AND ALT-III DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO PIMP!!!
Nic01
4th October 2003 14:27 UTC
wb Alt :)
www.visbot.net, get PimpBot. After that, pimp all your AVS.
Deamon
4th October 2003 18:35 UTC
Pimpbot rulez, it makes a great installer the easiest way you could ever want :)
horse-fly
6th October 2003 22:48 UTC
nic01: you goofed on the url: www.visbot.net
Synth-C
7th October 2003 19:21 UTC
Another idea for the newpicks:
Let half of them be selected by voting.
The other half should consist of presets made by artist who are not represted in the first half, so the great presets from the inactive avs'ers will be included (Unconed a.o), and al the best artist are included in the pack, so the most famous styles are represented.
This will make sure the newnewpicks will be pretty varried and all artist will have a chance to get in the newpicks.
Good idea?
*rubbing his sore fingers*
PAK-9
18th October 2003 11:50 UTC
I think J's idea is best, get one or two presets from everyone except the noobiest of noob noobs, that way everyone will find something they like in the pack, but put a strict deadline on peoples submissions.
horse-fly
18th October 2003 20:49 UTC
well if anything is going to happen with this, it better happen soon, as the beta version was already released
Zevensoft
19th October 2003 06:22 UTC
Here's one for the latest build:
pure-krypton
21st October 2003 12:39 UTC
my presets
please tell me if they're good or bad
BigBob
22nd October 2003 04:32 UTC
I like this Idea
As a n00bie, I like Jheriko's Idea. I Like the fact that our prests
(n00bie's) will be in the same pack as the great AVS artists.
I remeber the names from Winamp2 like 10ne and Justin, and makes me
happy to know that some day there maybe someone out there that will
remember my name and other fellow n00bie names. Not to mention, even
compare us with the greats of AVS. And it will be nice to show the
different levels of AVS, to show the newcommers that not all of AVS
is complex equtions, but just your imagination!
pure-krypton
22nd October 2003 07:52 UTC
but no really n00bie presets please
BigBob
22nd October 2003 16:17 UTC
What do mean really n00bie presets?
pure-krypton
23rd October 2003 23:47 UTC
my first pak at http://pure-krpton.deviantart.com -> alien landing
BigBob
24th October 2003 03:33 UTC
Ahh...I see what you mean, yeah your prests you sent for the newpicks, they seam pretty good. I like them.
pure-krypton
24th October 2003 06:18 UTC
thanks BigBob
BigBob
26th October 2003 19:41 UTC
I just want to make sure I got this right, we are not suppose to any 3d ssc?
Dragon-Dreams
29th October 2003 08:19 UTC
Id be really honoured if someone put one of my later presets in the pack. I think that they have some variation, without being complicated ( cause im too stupid to make comlicated presets... ) but theyre not too simple either.
Try these, ( just suggestions, if you like others better do tell, I thrive on praise. )
Dragon - Driving Force - Faust
Dragon - Ultima Thule - Eternal Winter
Dragon - Driving Force - The Eye of Opsis
Driving Force can be found on my devart page.
http://dragonavs.deviantart.com
Dragon-Dreams
29th October 2003 08:41 UTC
Edit: I agree with Jheriko's idea,
As much as I like Tuggummi and UnConeD's works, I think that chocking it full of 'The Best ever of AVS' will be kind of boring. Plus then what will real beginners have to learn off? The most complicated presets. Insane. Plus, you guys only seem to think that the best are the most technical.
Tuggummi
29th October 2003 13:28 UTC
Plus, you guys only seem to think that the best are the most technical.
I hope you don't mean me by that when you first say "As much as i like..." :igor: Because if you do, im forced to rip off your testicles and feed them to atero... ]:]
Dragon-Dreams
30th October 2003 01:04 UTC
Well, I did say Tuggummi didnt I? :p
I just don't think that we really need any more than one of each artists AVS in the newpicks.
Plus, if it were a 'Best of' we'd end up with like only 4 artists.
Atero eats Testicles? :weird:
Tuggummi
30th October 2003 06:13 UTC
/me is not technical!
/me is very angry for being called technical!
To the original topic, i have a feeling that none of these will be included since everyone started to have their own "great" ideas for the newpicks :igor: Why couldn't we just stick to rovastars plan...
horse-fly
1st November 2003 01:47 UTC
Why couldn't we just stick to rovastars plan...
which was... :p
Rovastar
1st November 2003 11:49 UTC
I gave up on the thread ages ago. I thought it would be a nice idea for the community to update the base presets.
Tuggummi
3rd November 2003 09:10 UTC
Then may i suggest a *clunk* and unstickie? And forget about the presets.
dlbiderman
14th November 2003 06:15 UTC
Anyone know Jheriko's contact info(email address; aim id)? Need to contact him about the Multi-Filter.
Tuggummi
14th November 2003 06:52 UTC
http://jheriko.deviantart.com
dlbiderman
14th November 2003 23:44 UTC
Anyone know working contact info for Nemo Orange? I tried nemoorange@yahoo.com and that bounced.
jheriko
15th November 2003 11:23 UTC
btw I have no source for multi filter which angers me greatly since I will never be able to update it now :(
Whats happening about the wa5 preset thing anyway?
edit: i haven't had an email... my address is jheriko@ntlworld.com
if there is some desperate reason to contact me then send mail in the next 24 hours cos i probably won't be back for two weeks.
Rovastar
15th November 2003 13:20 UTC
Well dlbiderman is winamp staff so probs something will happen.
skupers
16th November 2003 10:42 UTC
NemoOrange's AIM is 'NemoOrange' (sans quotes). Maybe that helps. You can also note him on DeviantArt for his new emailaddress. If you don't have a DeviantArt, I can do it for you if you want.
horse-fly
24th November 2003 22:56 UTC
skupers, the email pimp
WhiteRayven
24th November 2003 23:06 UTC
Anything from Desmod, pickin Dim 3, or my personaly favourite, Tuggumi
UnConeD
25th November 2003 02:13 UTC
This is the list of presets in WA5rc9.
http://acko.net/dump/wa5picks.txt
horse-fly
25th November 2003 02:36 UTC
looks like a good list
WhiteRayven
25th November 2003 04:08 UTC
nice
Tuggummi
25th November 2003 06:28 UTC
Nice list, tho i personally think i do have much better presets in my packs. Tho it might be a question about images, "exotic" ape's, filesize or even framerate why they can't be included, but I trust the staff on what they want to include whatever the reasons might be :)
pure-krypton
25th November 2003 06:35 UTC
i feel so privileged to be on that list :D
WhiteRayven
25th November 2003 06:47 UTC
Tuggummi, I have yet to see a preset of yours I didnt like.
Tuggummi
25th November 2003 07:49 UTC
Just watch my first works, that ought to do the trick ;)
Shock Value
26th November 2003 02:36 UTC
Anything from my pack is fair game (check sig, I think most of you have seen the pack). I've also attached a good one without any APEs except Convo and Color Map, which I think are allowed, right?
Rovastar
26th November 2003 14:25 UTC
Originally posted by UnConeD
This is the list of presets in WA5rc9.
http://acko.net/dump/wa5picks.txt
What no Mister Happy? :)
UnConeD
26th November 2003 17:47 UTC
Btw, I had almost nothing to do with that list ;). I just pointed the guy (David Biderman) to Whacko AVS VI, when it was obvious he'd missed that one (including ZGM1/2 but not 3).
Nic01
26th November 2003 23:04 UTC
Well, it's only appropriate.
It has a small (and somewhat major) error fixed and a slower rotation...
[expect Ripplescope 2.1 soon enough, with Ripples (from the contest) mixed in in a way]
OnionRingOfDoom
27th November 2003 19:38 UTC
Dude, we gotta have Mr. Happy! We gotta put in at least one preset with a creature/person that dances or something. Wow, I've been so uninvolved. I really need to check this place more often...
[Ishan]
28th November 2003 14:11 UTC
seems a fair enough list to me, altho yes i would like to see mr.happy there.
Nic01
28th November 2003 19:54 UTC
Meh.
Bandwagon of past presets...
pure-krypton
29th November 2003 01:02 UTC
anyone feel like checking out my minipack for some presets
http://www.deviantart.com/view/3802654
dirkdeftly
29th November 2003 10:53 UTC
Stupid useless completely demo oriented preset, and yes the colors are ugly as fuck, get back to me when I care :p
Edit: made it less sucky
dirkdeftly
29th November 2003 21:26 UTC
Edit: made it lesser suckiness. (finally works right.)
--wait a minute. what was this about me eating testicles?!
jheriko
7th December 2003 02:39 UTC
I'd really appreciate it if this preset made it onto the list somehow. It shows the power of the new AVS quite nicely... actually I could have made this with the old AVS... that last part was just a lie. But it does look damned good... and no, thats NOT max blending.
Yathosho
7th December 2003 11:04 UTC
very nice jheriko, but i find the background weird
zamuz
9th December 2003 00:19 UTC
started playing with jheriko's preset just for fun, and got something kinda nice actually, so here it is. hope's it's ok with ya jheriko. i made it in a really fast pc tho, please tell me if it's too slow or something.
jheriko
9th December 2003 03:19 UTC
Thats pretty neat :)
sidd
11th December 2003 06:02 UTC
im not sure if ive ever done anything conventional enough. :\
Prolly too late now anyway.
zamuz
13th December 2003 16:23 UTC
just in case, visions 3 was released and maybe one or two from the pack can go to the newpicks as well, that would be teh r0x0rz :)
worth the try... ;)
Tuggummi
18th December 2003 07:00 UTC
Uhm...
Clunk?