Archive: Presets for WA5


13th September 2003 21:33 UTC

Presets for WA5
Now I do not know if this will happen or not. But it is one of the things I would like to see.

A collection of the best of presets people have created over teh past couple of years. :)

A new newpicks as it were.

Now I have no idea how we can organise it but mayeb if we post our 3 favourite presets (I know it is difficult but we could have thousands otherwise). Maybe too get feedback from the DA ppl

Now it is too easy to decend into a DM-fest if you know what I mean (all DM-tastic presets :) ). Please try and show variety and diversoity, sound responsivness, etc that AVS can create, :)

Now if we keep this thread for presets only!!

Names of authors - preset name and a zip please.

Discussion can be made in another thread if you chooses so no I hate that preset blah, blah, blah.

Please don't just pimp your own stuff. In fact I am tempted to say do not include your own stuff and just nominate others. Yes lets do that. 3 other peoples presets. ok :)

Please repeat other peoples choices too so we get a sense of popularity/numbers.

Think long and hard it is so not easy just to pick 3 and we should have a few weeks before the new version of WA. :)

And hopefully we can collate them and select the most popular ones for newpicks2. :);)

Post away.


13th September 2003 22:26 UTC

UnConeD - Zero-G Maze 3
Jheriko - UnConeD - VJ Chmutov
Fsk - zvedka


13th September 2003 22:31 UTC

14:36:24 <Nic01> hmmh
14:36:36 <Nic01> 1st preset oughtta be something staying true to AVS, something based on sound
14:36:44 <Nic01> 2nd oughtta be the more calming, screensaver-type preset
14:37:07 <Nic01> 3rd oughtta be a mold of the two (DM presets tend to satisfy this)

*ahem*
What about APEs though?

I suggest a 9-preset system instead of 3, that's a little *too* tight to summarize the world of AVS.


13th September 2003 22:40 UTC

Y'know, if this happens, there will be SO many rips of these presets. If you look at the presets, I've seen tons of rips of the newpicks, the same thing with a couple modifications. The people in charge of removing rips did nothing about it.


14th September 2003 00:21 UTC

This is a great idea, but maybe you should only put your own X in, because otherwise we gotta go get permission from people. That is, if we want to include it in Winamp5.

Also, let's say no APE use in them. :) Maybe we'll include some
APEs in the final version, but I dunno...

-Justin


14th September 2003 01:00 UTC

In order to put in some of the best ones, we will need things like texer, colormap, and convo filter. These are essentials for the best.

My favorites:

UnConeD - Radiant
fsk - cube
el-VIS - avsstein remixed

3 just isn't enough!!! I want to put some Jheriko and tuggummi too.


14th September 2003 01:02 UTC

Dammit. Attachment:


14th September 2003 04:05 UTC

This is the only non-APE preset I can get in a flash (Second to Circular, but it returns Preset Too Large error when I make the edits to eliminate the APEs upon saving)


14th September 2003 04:08 UTC

If your going to put in some APE's with the release, the following are by far the most useful ones. Nowadays, youll rarely find a preset that doesnt use one of these:

Convulation fliter - Tom Holden
Color Map - UnConeD
Texer - UnConeD

There are a few others, less versatile, but still usfull in their own ways:

Channel Shift - UnConeD
Color Reduction - UnConeD
Video Delay - Tom Holden (vital APE for live vis-ing)
Multiplier - Unconed (just an extension of fast brightness, can be replaced by variouse other tools. eg color modifier)
Multi-Filter - Jheriko (sme as above)


14th September 2003 07:51 UTC

i second sidd here, i hardly make any preset without ape's.


14th September 2003 10:22 UTC

so do I, I almost always use the colormap by now. As for my favourites, I really don't know. I truly love some of the work of fsk, his cube etc. I also liked a lot of UnConeD and Tugg. I really can't tell which are my favourites. Some names:

UnConeD - ants in your pants
UnConeD - Moonbuggy
Raz - Satanic
Jheriko & UnConeD - VJ Chmutov <- this is certainly a top 3 one :)
Tuggummi - the worm-o-rama series (all of them)

etc. etc. I can't make a selection. There are too much good ones around.

Nobody selected me as their favourite? :( (:p j/k I know I suck) (though I don't like it...., I'll try not to suck)


14th September 2003 13:07 UTC

moonbuggy is not a final preset btw, that was just a stupid tech demo.


14th September 2003 17:51 UTC

how boring, why not some exclusive presets instead?

including the APEs would be a good thing, especially those who weren't ever or hardly updated (will there be a bugfixed texer anytime soon?).


15th September 2003 03:42 UTC

I say we use exclusive presets. I don't see what would be so hard to make some easy scoping/dm/colorful/reactive presets to showcase what AVS is best at.


15th September 2003 09:13 UTC

Hmm...

I don't have the presets with me, but from my upcoming pack "Extra Dimension" i could probably come up with 2 presets that don't use APE's.

"Cubed to death"
"Tanssiva Mies 3"

And then maybe as the 3rd preset "Plastic Avenue" from "Innovation!" could be one...

Tho i don't know will they work in the new AVS version, because i haven't tested yet. (i don't want to use wa3/wa5/wa2.9x... :cry: )


16th September 2003 06:20 UTC

Well i did take 3 presets from my last packs & upcoming pack and made them APEless (they were easy to make since they had only 1 or 2 ape's per preset)

So here is my 3 presets for the winamp 5 newpicks, they're not exclusive as yathosho there suggested, but they are some of my favorites & best without APE's :)

So here is my X for the permission to use these presets in the newpicks for the wa5 release (that is of course if you want to)


16th September 2003 13:40 UTC

A little voice told me that you do not need to remove the following APEs from your presets:

- Multiplier
- Channel Shift
- Color Reduction

And probably Color map too. ;)


16th September 2003 14:08 UTC

but.. but...

TEXER
:(


16th September 2003 20:56 UTC

People, please all remember that the newpicks cannot be hard-to-make presets. All newbies with hardly any or no expierence with AVS who view it the first time have to get the idea 'HEY! I can do this :D'. Without a shitload of simple stuff this won't happen anymore, and the chance on new blood is about zero then. If people really want some heavy-neatlooking stuff, they'll just download the packs from the plugin pages on winamp.com. Though sure there can be some really kickass presets, so they also think 'AVS is endless and superior!'.

Just some of my thoughts. It would just suck so hard when the AVS community would slowly dissapear because people are just frightened to start using something totally new, which can be very, very easy in the beginning.


16th September 2003 21:40 UTC

Daemon: I doubt it. I've been digging around online communities exploring whether or not an influx of advanced work discourages amateurs.

In my experience, most people are simply busy creating stuff for themselves, toying around and enjoying the fact that they are making something, even if the end result is hideous (e.g. check The Sims custom-furniture for a horror show of amateur photoshopping).

The ones that are really into it will soon become more advanced as long as people don't shrug them off too hard (i.e. getting the message across that you can't learn everything in 5 minutes).


17th September 2003 05:18 UTC

Yeah - the newpicks are there to drag them into AVS - you want to amaze them at the 1337n355 of AVS. They will learn on their own - I know I didn't really look at others code until after I had been AVSing for a while - and when I did, I knew to not go for something amazingly advanced.

When people first see AVS, they will immediately go to download more if they really like it. Then they will start experimenting.


17th September 2003 06:29 UTC

- Multiplier
- Channel Shift
- Color Reduction

And probably Color map too. ;)
Oh how lucky me, because i needed the convolution ape :p

17th September 2003 12:29 UTC

Originally posted by deamon
Tuggummi - the worm-o-rama series (all of them)
The worm-o-rama wasn't a series, it was one preset that some people liked to remix a bit too much :rolleyes: There was originally just one preset. (i felt like i had to point this out...:p)

18th September 2003 00:29 UTC

Hmm...

I suggest the top 10 AVS KO Tournament 2 for the newpicks (or the top presets up to that point, in case we don't finish soon enough ;))
For 2nd edition of newpicks2, probably a sort of AVSers' choice (and admin choice...) of either overall presets or AVS KO Tour 2.

Still, with our insane bipolaristic set of judges, I think it's a bad idea...


18th September 2003 03:44 UTC

I don't know if the AVS Tourny 2 would be a good showing of AVS. A lot of people are not participating in it for one thing, and it does show some of AVS's versatility, I don't know if it is an accurate representation of what we can do with this new version of AVS since it is not being used, ie-larger amount of variables, global variables, Color Modifier.


18th September 2003 09:42 UTC

I agree that the Tournament presets aren't actually "the best of AVS", because despite the fact that you are trying to "out do" each other, i still doubt these are your best works, we all know we keep our best works for our own packs and not post them on such irrelevant things as a AVS Tournament :rolleyes:

Besides, not everyone is participating in it...


18th September 2003 14:46 UTC

I agrees to Tuggummi.

Despite everyone's hopes, the tournaments don't always churn out the greatest presets.


18th September 2003 19:26 UTC

I made 8 exclusive remixes for newpicks. I also tried not to focus too much on the very well known avs creators.

yathosho - fabric (skupers remix) uses colormap
horse-fly - jinx (skupers remix) uses colormap, multiplier and convolution filter

If those APE's are a problem, you can leave those two presets out.


18th September 2003 20:44 UTC

Hey, how about some presets that don't suck FPS!!!

I mean, we all know that the Wacko stuff is great & all, but we have to consider putting in some visualizations that can appeal to everyone, not just techies & programmers or whatever. Also, newpics should be accessible to newbies since this will be their first introduction to AVS. If we put on a bunch of complex presets, they'll never be able to grasp the simple concepts that lie behind the visualizations.


18th September 2003 20:55 UTC

I tried to choose three of tuggummi's presets but it's impossible, there are so many amazing presets in the collection. Too many different great effects to choose just three. I doubt i can choose.


18th September 2003 21:39 UTC

Originally posted by NemoOrange
Hey, how about some presets that don't suck FPS!!!

I mean, we all know that the Wacko stuff is great & all, but we have to consider putting in some visualizations that can appeal to everyone, not just techies & programmers or whatever. Also, newpics should be accessible to newbies since this will be their first introduction to AVS. If we put on a bunch of complex presets, they'll never be able to grasp the simple concepts that lie behind the visualizations.
I agree, but there also have to be presets that show AVS at it's best.

19th September 2003 04:52 UTC

I tried to pick a couple that weren't huge framerate suckers.
They all run fast on my pc. And by fast I mean ~35FPS at 400x400.


19th September 2003 06:16 UTC

Hmm... even tho i selected quite fps sucker presets as my own "newpicks" , i agree with nemo, the newpicks has always been know for their speed. But im having a really hard time with the APEless concept, it's so damn hard to make great presets with the standard AVS effects and not only that, the APE's usually speed up the preset a lot...

Give me Convolution APE and i could probably give you some fps friendly presets :)


19th September 2003 08:28 UTC

APE-less preset for WA5:


19th September 2003 23:53 UTC

Format...
Are you going to make it like newpicks, in that there will be lots by one artist or will you just have a big mix of different artists?

If its the 'lots by one artist' I think tug should definately be in there.


20th September 2003 09:44 UTC

Re: Format...

Originally posted by PAK-9
Are you going to make it like newpicks, in that there will be lots by one artist or will you just have a big mix of different artists?

If its the 'lots by one artist' I think tug should definately be in there.
I think it should be a mix of a lot of artists for more variety. I was actually thinking of something like the Deskmod series.

20th September 2003 16:29 UTC

Originally posted by Nic01
Hmm...

I suggest the top 10 AVS KO Tournament 2 for the newpicks (or the top presets up to that point, in case we don't finish soon enough ;))
For 2nd edition of newpicks2, probably a sort of AVSers' choice (and admin choice...) of either overall presets or AVS KO Tour 2.

Still, with our insane bipolaristic set of judges, I think it's a bad idea...
:rolleyes:

21st September 2003 06:56 UTC

how about elvis or tonic, don't make the newpicks pure 3d, show the winamp downloaders somthing different then overdone 3d presets

Edit:

Skupers: if the apes end up being a big problem, you can just use the original preset to nominate


21st September 2003 09:52 UTC

demmit! most of my presets use convo...


21st September 2003 14:26 UTC

and most of mine use CMa.


21st September 2003 15:01 UTC

you do not need to remove the following APEs from your presets:

- Multiplier
- Channel Shift
- Color Reduction

And probably Color map too.
:rolleyes:

22nd September 2003 01:20 UTC

I think it would be much better if the whole avs community banded together and made a new newpicks from scratch with just one preset from each artist involved in addition to a small collection of existing presets. Before you all boo and crush my idea into dust let me explain my reasoning by way of advantages and disadvantages

Advantages


Disadvantages
If one preset each is a bit extreme then maybe two, plus I think it would be a good idea to get some of the noobs in on this, that way the newnewpicks will appeal to them and us.

:)

22nd September 2003 03:57 UTC

i think its an uber idea
that way noone will be able to gloa0: "100k @ m3!!1!!1 1 got 10 preezts in n00pix! w00t!" etc..

:|

And i think it would be a good insentive, everyone will be prety keen to make nice looking presets if they know the whole world is gonna see them.


22nd September 2003 04:17 UTC

Eh, I don't like the idea. But that may just be me


22nd September 2003 06:50 UTC

This is problematic indeed, i mean how we are going to make the "newpicks" with avs2.7 to the publishing of 2.7 if it is published the first time with the final version of wa5. This is a problem because something you made with pre3 might not work in pre4 or in the final version. (i've said this atleast 10 times in various places by now... :igor: )


22nd September 2003 06:54 UTC

I agree to tuggummi. We can't make a newpicks until the final version comes out - by then, we probably won't have time before Winamp 5 comes out and it gets released to the general public.

We need to just go with existing stuff - sure WA5 will have some cool stuff, but it won't make a huge difference in preset quality.

I also have said that we shouldn't make too many presets using 2.7 stuff until the final comes out - that would be a big pain if a lot of stuff got changed.


22nd September 2003 16:18 UTC

I thought my mixes were pretty varied :( .


22nd September 2003 18:23 UTC

I like jherikos plan. Dont know about this lets wait thing but Im definetly for deversity.


22nd September 2003 23:08 UTC

i dont see much point in waiting.. i cant imagne that avs2.7 wont be backward compatible. That would be just stupid.. Whas more, there has been no indication to suggest it from justin.


24th September 2003 00:57 UTC

honestly, just because these presets <b>could</b> be released with wa5 and avs2.7 doesn't mean that they <b>must</b> use the new components.

diversity is probably a great step for new users of winamp, as it would allow people to see the potential of a completely user defined visual program. But while not always the most technical presets, the people over at nullsoft do the best job of diversity. Many of you have already picked a style, and nothing will take you out of it, but the thing is that if i were a new user, i wouldn't want to see 30 something presets of 3D ideas that, for the most part, are rather similiar.

You as a society have placed yourself in a paradigm where everything must use snazzy DM and beyond complicated SSC. Honestly, i don't believe that most of you see the beauty of simplicity, of changing your style to a more conceptual one. There are a few exceptions out there, but for the most part, you focus on the mathmatical pieces rather than realizing that AVS is supposed to be art.

Sorry for rambling, but just a thought from someone who's been working with the program for about 4 years now.

~Horse-Fly


24th September 2003 01:33 UTC

Well said, HF, but complexity can make even better presets.

There are people who do really simple presets that are awesome, but then some people can make some of the most visually stunning complex presets that I can imagine. Neither is really better, IMO. I am personally better at doing more complex ones - I don't have enough of an artistic touch to make something simple look really nice like some people do. The ones that use crazy code are actually easier for me to make - I have a very mathematical mind.

We should try to get a mix - show the full spectrum of AVS presets.


24th September 2003 08:47 UTC

I totally agree with Jheriko, the idea is great. If we're gonna do this, count me in :D


25th September 2003 09:55 UTC

Originally posted by Horse-Fly
You as a society have placed yourself in a paradigm where everything must use snazzy DM and beyond complicated SSC...
..and the same boring cubes other people already did a zillion times like 2 years ago :p

i find jheriko's a very good one. looks like the best solution, only egomanics wouldn't like it.

26th September 2003 08:02 UTC

..and the same boring cubes other people already did a zillion times like 2 years ago
hahah, look who's talking :p I know of 2 certain remixes who both were made from cube presets ;)



I... I can't decide which side to "fall in"... I have enjoyed making 3D presets for my next pack, but at the moment it feels like agony to make those complex things. Sometimes heavy coding is fun (for me this means lots& lots of simple things used together), but i also enjoy making simple things. But i think you have to know atleast some code even to do the conceptual pieces, face it rotoblitter just doesn't do it anymore, it's so boring & monotenous.

26th September 2003 08:51 UTC

well.. ive only really been at it for less than a year.. but the way i work has always been: idea>thought>code (with a whole bunch of pullinmg out hair in the meantime.. sometimes my presets are very simple, because they didnt need to be complex to achieve the original idea. Some use all sorts of crazy junky code, and others are just plain fucked up (the whole unicycle ordeal).

anyways.. my point was something like: lets go with j's idea, and concentrate on making a bunch of presets that show diversity.. demonstrate everyones differnt styles.. and ARNT stupidly complicated just for the sake of looking all geeky and clever. Lets just make some uber presets..

let me know if that made any sense. Im a bit sloshed right now.. this room feels like its tilted 90o.. X_x

MMMMMMmmmmmmm...


26th September 2003 14:17 UTC

I would think that 2.7 is bound to be backwardly compatible with the pre-releases, even if newer features demanded that the file format change I doubt it would be hard to add back compatibility since it will have to load 2.5 presets too, it makes good sense.


26th September 2003 15:25 UTC

You can use this, no APE's used. And it shows a hint towards a way of making a DM torus by bending the rays ;)

PS. I'm drunk.


26th September 2003 15:56 UTC

ps, i suk @ avs


26th September 2003 16:09 UTC

That could be an awesome preset - it's really weird how it's an impossible setup. Just needs some music responsiveness.


2nd October 2003 12:13 UTC

So what is the plan? Do we stick to the original and each post 3 presets with no APE's (except what might be included in). Or do we break apart from this and make our own "newpicks" pack which we then publish outside the actual wa5 release? Or what? :igor: Im so very confused... and scared :eek: :confused:


3rd October 2003 12:11 UTC

This is great a idea please check my creation in my signature.

Top of them are: Persian Style, NOUR-e-OMID, FUTURE MIX, TIME OUT.


4th October 2003 07:03 UTC

Alt-iii here:
I feel bad for the noobs that DL the new WA5. They won't be exposed to my brilliant artwork.. Why? because winamp.com only accepts pimped avs files. AND ALT-III DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO PIMP!!!


4th October 2003 14:27 UTC

wb Alt :)

www.visbot.net, get PimpBot. After that, pimp all your AVS.


4th October 2003 18:35 UTC

Pimpbot rulez, it makes a great installer the easiest way you could ever want :)


6th October 2003 22:48 UTC

nic01: you goofed on the url: www.visbot.net


7th October 2003 19:21 UTC

Another idea for the newpicks:
Let half of them be selected by voting.
The other half should consist of presets made by artist who are not represted in the first half, so the great presets from the inactive avs'ers will be included (Unconed a.o), and al the best artist are included in the pack, so the most famous styles are represented.
This will make sure the newnewpicks will be pretty varried and all artist will have a chance to get in the newpicks.
Good idea?
*rubbing his sore fingers*


18th October 2003 11:50 UTC

I think J's idea is best, get one or two presets from everyone except the noobiest of noob noobs, that way everyone will find something they like in the pack, but put a strict deadline on peoples submissions.


18th October 2003 20:49 UTC

well if anything is going to happen with this, it better happen soon, as the beta version was already released


19th October 2003 06:22 UTC

Here's one for the latest build:


21st October 2003 12:39 UTC

my presets

please tell me if they're good or bad


22nd October 2003 04:32 UTC

I like this Idea
As a n00bie, I like Jheriko's Idea. I Like the fact that our prests
(n00bie's) will be in the same pack as the great AVS artists.
I remeber the names from Winamp2 like 10ne and Justin, and makes me
happy to know that some day there maybe someone out there that will
remember my name and other fellow n00bie names. Not to mention, even
compare us with the greats of AVS. And it will be nice to show the
different levels of AVS, to show the newcommers that not all of AVS
is complex equtions, but just your imagination!


22nd October 2003 07:52 UTC

but no really n00bie presets please


22nd October 2003 16:17 UTC

What do mean really n00bie presets?


23rd October 2003 23:47 UTC

my first pak at http://pure-krpton.deviantart.com -> alien landing


24th October 2003 03:33 UTC

Ahh...I see what you mean, yeah your prests you sent for the newpicks, they seam pretty good. I like them.


24th October 2003 06:18 UTC

thanks BigBob


26th October 2003 19:41 UTC

I just want to make sure I got this right, we are not suppose to any 3d ssc?


29th October 2003 08:19 UTC

Id be really honoured if someone put one of my later presets in the pack. I think that they have some variation, without being complicated ( cause im too stupid to make comlicated presets... ) but theyre not too simple either.

Try these, ( just suggestions, if you like others better do tell, I thrive on praise. )

Dragon - Driving Force - Faust
Dragon - Ultima Thule - Eternal Winter
Dragon - Driving Force - The Eye of Opsis

Driving Force can be found on my devart page.

http://dragonavs.deviantart.com


29th October 2003 08:41 UTC

Edit: I agree with Jheriko's idea,
As much as I like Tuggummi and UnConeD's works, I think that chocking it full of 'The Best ever of AVS' will be kind of boring. Plus then what will real beginners have to learn off? The most complicated presets. Insane. Plus, you guys only seem to think that the best are the most technical.


29th October 2003 13:28 UTC

Plus, you guys only seem to think that the best are the most technical.
I hope you don't mean me by that when you first say "As much as i like..." :igor: Because if you do, im forced to rip off your testicles and feed them to atero... ]:]

30th October 2003 01:04 UTC

Well, I did say Tuggummi didnt I? :p
I just don't think that we really need any more than one of each artists AVS in the newpicks.
Plus, if it were a 'Best of' we'd end up with like only 4 artists.

Atero eats Testicles? :weird:


30th October 2003 06:13 UTC

/me is not technical!
/me is very angry for being called technical!



To the original topic, i have a feeling that none of these will be included since everyone started to have their own "great" ideas for the newpicks :igor: Why couldn't we just stick to rovastars plan...


1st November 2003 01:47 UTC

Why couldn't we just stick to rovastars plan...
which was... :p

1st November 2003 11:49 UTC

I gave up on the thread ages ago. I thought it would be a nice idea for the community to update the base presets.


3rd November 2003 09:10 UTC

Then may i suggest a *clunk* and unstickie? And forget about the presets.


14th November 2003 06:15 UTC

Anyone know Jheriko's contact info(email address; aim id)? Need to contact him about the Multi-Filter.


14th November 2003 06:52 UTC

http://jheriko.deviantart.com


14th November 2003 23:44 UTC

Anyone know working contact info for Nemo Orange? I tried nemoorange@yahoo.com and that bounced.


15th November 2003 11:23 UTC

btw I have no source for multi filter which angers me greatly since I will never be able to update it now :(

Whats happening about the wa5 preset thing anyway?

edit: i haven't had an email... my address is jheriko@ntlworld.com
if there is some desperate reason to contact me then send mail in the next 24 hours cos i probably won't be back for two weeks.


15th November 2003 13:20 UTC

Well dlbiderman is winamp staff so probs something will happen.


16th November 2003 10:42 UTC

NemoOrange's AIM is 'NemoOrange' (sans quotes). Maybe that helps. You can also note him on DeviantArt for his new emailaddress. If you don't have a DeviantArt, I can do it for you if you want.


24th November 2003 22:56 UTC

skupers, the email pimp


24th November 2003 23:06 UTC

Anything from Desmod, pickin Dim 3, or my personaly favourite, Tuggumi


25th November 2003 02:13 UTC

This is the list of presets in WA5rc9.

http://acko.net/dump/wa5picks.txt


25th November 2003 02:36 UTC

looks like a good list


25th November 2003 04:08 UTC

nice


25th November 2003 06:28 UTC

Nice list, tho i personally think i do have much better presets in my packs. Tho it might be a question about images, "exotic" ape's, filesize or even framerate why they can't be included, but I trust the staff on what they want to include whatever the reasons might be :)


25th November 2003 06:35 UTC

i feel so privileged to be on that list :D


25th November 2003 06:47 UTC

Tuggummi, I have yet to see a preset of yours I didnt like.


25th November 2003 07:49 UTC

Just watch my first works, that ought to do the trick ;)


26th November 2003 02:36 UTC

Anything from my pack is fair game (check sig, I think most of you have seen the pack). I've also attached a good one without any APEs except Convo and Color Map, which I think are allowed, right?


26th November 2003 14:25 UTC

Originally posted by UnConeD
This is the list of presets in WA5rc9.

http://acko.net/dump/wa5picks.txt
What no Mister Happy? :)

26th November 2003 17:47 UTC

Btw, I had almost nothing to do with that list ;). I just pointed the guy (David Biderman) to Whacko AVS VI, when it was obvious he'd missed that one (including ZGM1/2 but not 3).


26th November 2003 23:04 UTC

Well, it's only appropriate.
It has a small (and somewhat major) error fixed and a slower rotation...

[expect Ripplescope 2.1 soon enough, with Ripples (from the contest) mixed in in a way]


27th November 2003 19:38 UTC

Dude, we gotta have Mr. Happy! We gotta put in at least one preset with a creature/person that dances or something. Wow, I've been so uninvolved. I really need to check this place more often...


28th November 2003 14:11 UTC

seems a fair enough list to me, altho yes i would like to see mr.happy there.


28th November 2003 19:54 UTC

Meh.

Bandwagon of past presets...


29th November 2003 01:02 UTC

anyone feel like checking out my minipack for some presets



http://www.deviantart.com/view/3802654


29th November 2003 10:53 UTC

Stupid useless completely demo oriented preset, and yes the colors are ugly as fuck, get back to me when I care :p

Edit: made it less sucky


29th November 2003 21:26 UTC

Edit: made it lesser suckiness. (finally works right.)


--wait a minute. what was this about me eating testicles?!


7th December 2003 02:39 UTC

I'd really appreciate it if this preset made it onto the list somehow. It shows the power of the new AVS quite nicely... actually I could have made this with the old AVS... that last part was just a lie. But it does look damned good... and no, thats NOT max blending.


7th December 2003 11:04 UTC

very nice jheriko, but i find the background weird


9th December 2003 00:19 UTC

started playing with jheriko's preset just for fun, and got something kinda nice actually, so here it is. hope's it's ok with ya jheriko. i made it in a really fast pc tho, please tell me if it's too slow or something.


9th December 2003 03:19 UTC

Thats pretty neat :)


11th December 2003 06:02 UTC

im not sure if ive ever done anything conventional enough. :\
Prolly too late now anyway.


13th December 2003 16:23 UTC

just in case, visions 3 was released and maybe one or two from the pack can go to the newpicks as well, that would be teh r0x0rz :)

worth the try... ;)


18th December 2003 07:00 UTC

Uhm...

Clunk?