22nd August 2002 10:30 UTC
frescati
yeah, a new preset from me, it has a wicked "multi-functional"-dm that gives a certain look into it,
comments are appriciated
Archive: frescati
Montana
22nd August 2002 10:30 UTC
frescati
yeah, a new preset from me, it has a wicked "multi-functional"-dm that gives a certain look into it,
comments are appriciated
Montana
22nd August 2002 10:32 UTC
oh sorry, forgot to attach the preset
Jaheckelsafar
22nd August 2002 12:09 UTC
That's pretty nice. I'd try and get the background to stobe with the beat though.
dirkdeftly
23rd August 2002 05:03 UTC
Sweet colors...I wouldn't strobe it though. I think you should have a background that's either white or black (white'd be better, I'm tired of black presets :P), but not gray...gray's kinda blah. *hides in case he's insulting montana's taste yet again*
Attached a remix that clips the gray areas out. Only problem it presents is when the scopes get gray...but since the likelyhood one of them will is 256^-3, or approx 0.000,000,059, and that IF one goes off, it's probably not going to be noticed, I don't think it's that much of a concern :P
Xion(810)
23rd August 2002 21:37 UTC
Sweet preset...but is it just me or is the origional faster than the remix?
dirkdeftly
26th August 2002 07:15 UTC
Probably, since I added stuff to it...but why does it matter?
Xion(810)
26th August 2002 18:54 UTC
I dunno...I think that a preset that responds quicker is better...although sometimes a slower processor is needed for full effects...(The Landscape is killing me)
dirkdeftly
27th August 2002 19:23 UTC
You forget about UnConeD, Duo, S_KuPeRS...me...all people who make very good (hopefully good, in my case) presets that aren't fast at all. That's the problem with going for speed - you cut corners that you really shouldn't cut. *cough* 16x16 *cough* ;)
Montana
27th August 2002 22:28 UTC
stuart, knock it off, so i'm going for speed and using dm's with low gridsizes, so what, i wanna look at my presets in fullscreen w/o pixeldoubling & with high framerates, (stuart, i have a crap computer), so stuart, just knock it off
dirkdeftly
28th August 2002 08:13 UTC
Dude, calm down...I'm just saying that speed isn't always the thing you want to go for, especially if it makes the preset look ugly - the only thing I was talking about was when you were using a low gridsize that looked really bad. I was just using that as an example.
But we digress. What do you think of making the background black or white?
And was my preset a total insult to your artistic vision(s)? :P
Montana
28th August 2002 18:55 UTC
no, it wasn't a insult, stuart, i felt your remix was a disapointment, it wasn't fully a remix, it was more a edit,
dirkdeftly
30th August 2002 00:37 UTC
I didn't mean it to be. It was mainly a color remix, not a rendering remix...I was thinking about feedbacking it (probably putting the whole thing in an effect list, setting it to output: maxblend and input: adjustable blend 25%, then blitter feedback on the outside :D) but I thought it would take away from the preset and didn't try it.
Nic01
30th August 2002 03:01 UTC
Atero, here's a proper way to remix :p (attached)
I think there are 3 levels of remixing... Edit (only edits), Mix (Some edits, some additions), Remix (a lot of changes, a lot of difference in looks)...
Anyways, enjoy the mix.
Montana
30th August 2002 22:12 UTC
nic, i dig the remix, i like the kalideoscopal edge to it
dirkdeftly
31st August 2002 11:20 UTC
You asked for it >:D
Montana
31st August 2002 12:17 UTC
wicked stuart, very wicked, the colors are very hypnotizing
dirkdeftly
31st August 2002 23:06 UTC
LOL, never tell me I'm dissapointing ;) I was nice this time and only did one, if it wasn't late at night I would've done about seven, then kept going on :P
And ya never know, I could even make something better than the original :D
Montana
1st September 2002 13:45 UTC
Originally posted by Aterono you can't stuart, the original always is the best
LOL, never tell me I'm dissapointing ;) I was nice this time and only did one, if it wasn't late at night I would've done about seven, then kept going on :P
And ya never know, I could even make something better than the original :D
dirkdeftly
3rd September 2002 09:05 UTC
That depends. For instance, take a normal C chord. Modify it to a Cb1-3add9add11, making it a G7 chord. So if you like dominant sevenths better than 'vanilla' chords, the modified version is better.
:P
Seriously tho, there's several ways to make the 'original' spiral ssc supplied with AVS more dynamic and, therefore, better...that's just one example. There's probably ways to modify UnConeD's Water Cube to make it look or work better (without sacrificing the looks or speed), too ;)
Fork me on GitHub